Interplay of meaning, syntax and working memory during pronoun resolution investigated by ERPs

被引:35
作者
Hammer, Anke [1 ]
Jansma, Bernadette M. [2 ]
Lamers, Monique [3 ]
Munte, Thomas F. [1 ]
机构
[1] Otto VonGuericke Univ Magdegurg, FNW Inst Psychol, Dept Neuropsychol, D-39016 Magdeburg, Germany
[2] Maastricht Univ, Fac Psychol & Neurosci, Dept Cognit Neurosci, Maastricht, Netherlands
[3] Univ Nijmegen, Dept Linguist, Nijmegen, Netherlands
关键词
language; pronoun processing; working memory; syntax; meaning; event-related potential (ERP); N400; P600;
D O I
10.1016/j.brainres.2008.07.004
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Event-related potentials were used to investigate the interaction of verbal working memory and gender information during pronoun resolution. Gender information is supposed to be disentangled using sentences about persons (semantic/syntactic) or things (syntactic) followed by gender congruent or incongruent pronouns. Memory was manipulated using differential distances (short distance (SD) and long distances with or without intermediate subject gaps (LD gap and LD no gap)) between the pronoun and the antecedent. Comparing incongruent to congruent conditions, person sentences with SD and LD no gap resulted in an N400-like effect indicating the involvement of semantic integration, whereas a P600 effect in LD gap (re-activated antecedents) sentences suggested the involvement of syntactic reanalysis. SD-thing sentences showed a P600 effect, whereas LD thing sentences revealed no effect at pronoun position. A delayed N400 effect for thing sentences was observed instead. Based on preceding and the current data, we present a working model on how the parser switches between the use of semantic and syntactic information to establish co-reference and how this switch depends on the type of antecedent, distance, or syntactic structure. (c) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:177 / 191
页数:15
相关论文
共 64 条
[31]   The P600 as an index of syntactic integration difficulty [J].
Kaan, E ;
Harris, A ;
Gibson, E ;
Holcomb, P .
LANGUAGE AND COGNITIVE PROCESSES, 2000, 15 (02) :159-201
[32]   Repair, revision, and complexity in syntactic analysis: An electrophysiological differentiation [J].
Kaan, E ;
Swaab, TY .
JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 2003, 15 (01) :98-110
[33]   BRIDGING THE GAP - EVIDENCE FROM ERPS ON THE PROCESSING OF UNBOUNDED DEPENDENCIES [J].
KLUENDER, R ;
KUTAS, M .
JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 1993, 5 (02) :196-214
[34]   Structure and limited capacity in verbal working memory: A study with event-related potentials [J].
Kolk, HHJ ;
Chwilla, DJ ;
van Herten, M ;
Oor, PJW .
BRAIN AND LANGUAGE, 2003, 85 (01) :1-36
[35]   Neural mechanisms of language comprehension: Challenges to syntax [J].
Kuperberg, Gina R. .
BRAIN RESEARCH, 2007, 1146 :23-49
[36]   Distinct patterns of neural modulation during the processing of conceptual and syntactic anomalies [J].
Kuperberg, GR ;
Holcomb, PJ ;
Sitnikova, T ;
Greve, D ;
Dale, AM ;
Caplan, D .
JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 2003, 15 (02) :272-293
[37]   EVENT-RELATED BRAIN POTENTIALS TO GRAMMATICAL ERRORS AND SEMANTIC ANOMALIES [J].
KUTAS, M ;
HILLYARD, SA .
MEMORY & COGNITION, 1983, 11 (05) :539-550
[38]   READING SENSELESS SENTENCES - BRAIN POTENTIALS REFLECT SEMANTIC INCONGRUITY [J].
KUTAS, M ;
HILLYARD, SA .
SCIENCE, 1980, 207 (4427) :203-205
[39]   Neural correlates of semantic and syntactic processes in the comprehension of case marked pronouns:: Evidence from German and Dutch [J].
Lamers, MJ ;
Jansma, BM ;
Hammer, A ;
Münte, TF .
BMC NEUROSCIENCE, 2006, 7 (1)
[40]   MEASURING INHIBITION AND FACILITATION FROM PRONOUNS [J].
MACDONALD, MC ;
MACWHINNEY, B .
JOURNAL OF MEMORY AND LANGUAGE, 1990, 29 (04) :469-492