Some philosophical considerations in using mixed methods in library and information science research

被引:25
作者
Ma, Lai [1 ]
机构
[1] Indiana Univ, Sch Lib & Informat Sci, Bloomington, IN 47405 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY | 2012年 / 63卷 / 09期
关键词
epistemology; research methods; contextual information; DISCOURSE ANALYSIS; RETRIEVAL;
D O I
10.1002/asi.22711
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Mixed methods research (MMR) has been described as the third research paradigm that combines qualitative and quantitative research methods. The mixing of research methods requires an epistemological framework that embraces the reality uncovered by different research methods. Three formal ontological categories are introduced for deconstructing the polarized view of reality in objectivism and relativism and for differentiating the nature and characteristics of objective, subjective, and normative validity claims as well as the conditions for justifying objectivity in social research. The characterization of information as objective, subjective, and normative-evaluative simultaneously demands the study of conditions of information-related phenomena that may call for mixed methods research in library and information science.
引用
收藏
页码:1859 / 1867
页数:9
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], P AM SOC INFORM SCI
[2]  
[Anonymous], PHYS VIEW NATURE 2
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1988, On the Logic of the Social Sciences
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1986, Laboratory life: the construction of scientific facts
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2011, PARADIGMATIC CONTROV
[6]  
[Anonymous], 1996, Critical Ethnography in Educational Research: A Theoretical and Practical Guide
[7]  
[Anonymous], **DROPPED REF**
[8]   Toward a critical theoretic perspective in information systems [J].
Benoît, G .
LIBRARY QUARTERLY, 2002, 72 (04) :441-471
[9]  
Bernstein Richard., 1983, OBJECTIVISM RELATIVI
[10]  
Best J., 2008, Stat-spotting: A field guide to identifying dubious data