Identification of probiotic cultures in food samples

被引:39
作者
Reuter, G
Klein, G
Goldberg, M
机构
[1] Free Univ Berlin, Fac Vet, D-14195 Berlin, Germany
[2] Fed Inst Hlth Protect Consumers & Vet Med, D-12277 Berlin, Germany
关键词
probiotic cultures; lactobacilli; bifidobacteria; phenotypic identification; molecular-based methods; workload and precision; criteria for the selection of strains as probiotic cultures;
D O I
10.1016/S0963-9969(01)00172-7
中图分类号
TS2 [食品工业];
学科分类号
0832 ;
摘要
Probiotic cultures are used increasingly in dairy products. Confusion occurred due to false declarations and the uncritical selection of strains. Efficacy of probiotic cultures depends on special properties of single strains, however. Over the last 30 years, own experience was made with strains of the genera Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium, especially out of the groups of Lactobacillus acidophilus, Lactobacillus easel, and Lactobacillus reuteri/fermentum which were collected from commercial probiotic food samples as well as from pharmaceuticals and nutrients for animals. They were compared with reference strains from culture collections. Phenotypic criteria revealed a grouping of isolates at genus level and, in most cases, a correct identification of species, too. False declarations of cultures used world-wide as probiotics could thus be detected. In order to confirm questionable species or to characterise specific strains within a species, molecular-based methods had to be applied. Good results were obtained by (1) SDS-PAGE of soluble proteins of cells, (2) RAPD-PCR, (3) PFGE-technique and (4) dot blot hybridisation methods using gene probes. Costs and workload differed considerably. SDS-PAGE and RAPD-PCR required data bases, dot blot hybridisation worked faster and more productively, For confirmations, at least one molecular-based method has to be applied. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:117 / 124
页数:8
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]  
ALTSCHUL SF, 1990, J MOL BIOL, V215, P403, DOI 10.1006/jmbi.1990.9999
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1999, ERNAHRUNGS UMSCHAU, V47, P191
[3]  
BONAPARTE C, 1997, MICROECOL THER, V26, P181
[4]  
BONAPARTE C, 1997, THESIS TU FREIE U BE
[5]   DEOXYRIBONUCLEIC-ACID HOMOLOGY STUDIES OF LACTOBACILLUS-CASEI, LACTOBACILLUS-PARACASEI SP-NOV, SUBSP PARACASEI AND SUBSP TOLERANS, AND LACTOBACILLUS-RHAMNOSUS SP-NOV, COMB-NOV [J].
COLLINS, MD ;
PHILLIPS, BA ;
ZANONI, P .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SYSTEMATIC BACTERIOLOGY, 1989, 39 (02) :105-108
[6]   Reclassification of Lactobacillus casei subsp casei ATCC 393 and Lactobacillus rhamnosus ATCC 15820 as Lactobacillus zeae nom rev, designation of ATCC 334 as the neotype of L-casei subsp casei, and rejection of the Lactobacillus paracasei [J].
Dicks, LMT ;
DuPlessis, EM ;
Dellaglio, F ;
Lauer, E .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SYSTEMATIC BACTERIOLOGY, 1996, 46 (01) :337-340
[7]   TAXONOMIC STUDY OF THE LACTOBACILLUS-ACIDOPHILUS GROUP, WITH RECOGNITION OF LACTOBACILLUS-GALLINARUM SP-NOV AND LACTOBACILLUS-JOHNSONII SP-NOV AND SYNONYMY OF LACTOBACILLUS-ACIDOPHILUS GROUP-A3 (JOHNSON ET-AL 1980) WITH THE TYPE STRAIN OF LACTOBACILLUS-AMYLOVORUS (NAKAMURA 1981) [J].
FUJISAWA, T ;
BENNO, Y ;
YAESHIMA, T ;
MITSUOKA, T .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SYSTEMATIC BACTERIOLOGY, 1992, 42 (03) :487-491
[8]   Characterization of reutericyclin produced by Lactobacillus reuteri LTH2584 [J].
Gänzle, MG ;
Höltzel, A ;
Walter, J ;
Jung, G ;
Hammes, WP .
APPLIED AND ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2000, 66 (10) :4325-4333
[9]  
GOLDBERG M, 2000, P 41 ARB ARB LEB DTS, V2, P450
[10]   Overview of gut flora and probiotics [J].
Holzapfel, WH ;
Haberer, P ;
Snel, J ;
Schillinger, U ;
Huis in't Veld, JHJ .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FOOD MICROBIOLOGY, 1998, 41 (02) :85-101