How consumers and policymakers can use systematic reviews for decision making

被引:125
作者
Bero, LA [1 ]
Jadad, AR [1 ]
机构
[1] MCMASTER UNIV, DEPT CLIN EPIDEMIOL & BIOSTAT, HLTH INFORMAT RES UNIT, HAMILTON, ON L8N 3Z5, CANADA
关键词
D O I
10.7326/0003-4819-127-1-199707010-00007
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Systematic reviews can be a very useful decision-making tool because they objectively summarize large amounts of information, identify gaps in medical research, and identify beneficial or harmful interventions. Consumers can use systematic reviews to help them make health care decisions. Policymakers can use systematic reviews to help them make decisions about what types of health care to provide. Despite the potential value of systematic reviews, little evidence of their direct impact on the decisions made by consumers and policymakers is available. We discuss strategies for optimizing the use of systematic reviews by increasing the awareness and identification of reviews, learning to critically evaluate the findings of reviews, and overcoming barriers to the incorporation of reviews into the decision-making process. In addition, the participation of consumers and policymakers in the design, conduct, and reporting of systematic reviews can help to produce reviews that are relevant and understandable to target audiences. Because decisions that involve health care policies and issues are complex processes in which information (such as that provided by systematic reviews) plays only a part, strategies for increasing the use of systematic reviews should be evaluated for their usefulness in the decisionmaking process.
引用
收藏
页码:37 / 42
页数:6
相关论文
共 51 条
[11]   The Internet's challenge to health care provision - A free market in information will conflict with a controlled market in health care [J].
Coiera, E .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1996, 312 (7022) :3-4
[12]   Systematic reviews: Synthesis of best evidence for clinical decisions [J].
Cook, DJ ;
Mulrow, CD ;
Haynes, RB .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1997, 126 (05) :376-380
[13]   ALTERNATIVE PERSPECTIVES ON THE BIASED FOUNDATIONS OF MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY-ASSESSMENT [J].
DIAMOND, GA ;
DENTON, TA .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1993, 118 (06) :455-464
[14]   THE EVOLUTION OF CLINICAL POLICIES [J].
DIXON, AS .
MEDICAL CARE, 1990, 28 (03) :201-220
[15]   EVIDENCE BASED PURCHASING - UNDERSTANDING RESULTS OF CLINICAL-TRIALS AND SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS [J].
FAHEY, T ;
GRIFFITHS, S ;
PETERS, TJ .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1995, 311 (7012) :1056-1059
[16]   DEALING WITH UNCERTAINTY - WILL SCIENCE SOLVE THE PROBLEMS OF RESOURCE-ALLOCATION IN THE UK NHS [J].
FREEMANTLE, N .
SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 1995, 40 (10) :1365-1370
[17]   CLINICAL USE OF DOPPLER ULTRASOUND IN PREGNANCY - INFORMATION FROM 6 RANDOMIZED TRIALS [J].
GILES, W ;
BISITS, A .
FETAL DIAGNOSIS AND THERAPY, 1993, 8 (04) :247-255
[18]   PASSIVE SMOKING AND HEART-DISEASE - EPIDEMIOLOGY, PHYSIOLOGY, AND BIOCHEMISTRY [J].
GLANTZ, SA ;
PARMLEY, WW .
CIRCULATION, 1991, 83 (01) :1-12
[19]  
GOEL V, 1994, DISSEMINATING RES CH, V6, P166
[20]   THE RIGHTS OF PATIENTS IN RESEARCH - PATIENTS MUST COME FIRST IN RESEARCH [J].
GOODARE, H ;
SMITH, R .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1995, 310 (6990) :1277-1278