Where do cyclists ride? A route choice model developed with revealed preference GPS data

被引:489
作者
Broach, Joseph [1 ]
Dill, Jennifer [1 ]
Gliebe, John [2 ]
机构
[1] Portland State Univ, Nohad A Toulan Sch Urban Studies & Planning, Portland, OR 97207 USA
[2] Resource Syst Grp Inc, White River Jct, VT 05001 USA
关键词
Bicycling; Route choice; Bicycle infrastructure; Bicycle lanes; Revealed preference; TRAVEL BEHAVIOR; BICYCLE FACILITIES; TRANSPORTATION; WORK;
D O I
10.1016/j.tra.2012.07.005
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
To better understand bicyclists' preferences for facility types, GPS units were used to observe the behavior of 164 cyclists in Portland, Oregon, USA for several days each. Trip purpose and several other trip-level variables recorded by the cyclists, and the resulting trips were coded to a highly detailed bicycle network. The authors used the 1449 non-exercise, utilitarian trips to estimate a bicycle route choice model. The model used a choice set generation algorithm based on multiple permutations of path attributes and was formulated to account for overlapping route alternatives. The findings suggest that cyclists are sensitive to the effects of distance, turn frequency, slope, intersection control (e.g. presence or absence of traffic signals), and traffic volumes. In addition, cyclists appear to place relatively high value on off-street bike paths, enhanced neighborhood bikeways with traffic calming features (aka "bicycle boulevards"), and bridge facilities. Bike lanes more or less exactly offset the negative effects of adjacent traffic, but were no more or less attractive than a basic low traffic volume street. Finally, route preferences differ between commute and other utilitarian trips: cyclists were more sensitive to distance and less sensitive to other infrastructure characteristics for commute trips. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1730 / 1740
页数:11
相关论文
共 49 条
[21]  
Hoogendoorn-Lanser S, 2005, TRANSPORT RES REC, P27
[22]   Cycling to work in Phoenix - Route choice, travel behavior, and commuter characteristics [J].
Howard, C ;
Burns, EK .
2001 TRB DISTINGUISHED LECTURE, PT 1 - BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN RESEARCH, PT 2: SAFETY AND HUMAN PERFORMANCE, 2001, (1773) :39-46
[23]  
Hsiao C., 2003, Analysis of panel data, DOI DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511754203
[24]   Influences on bicycle use [J].
Hunt, J. D. ;
Abraham, J. E. .
TRANSPORTATION, 2007, 34 (04) :453-470
[25]  
Jackson ME, 1998, TRANSPORT RES REC, P8
[26]  
Jensen S.U., 2007, 86 ANN M TRANSP RES
[27]   A detailed analysis of how an urban trail system affects cyclists' travel [J].
Krizek, Kevin J. ;
El-Geneidy, Ahmed ;
Thompson, Kristin .
TRANSPORTATION, 2007, 34 (05) :611-624
[28]   Two approaches to valuing dome of bicycle facilities' presumed benefits [J].
Krizek, Kevin J. .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION, 2006, 72 (03) :309-320
[29]  
Landis B. W., 1997, Transportation Research Record, V1578, P119, DOI [10.3141/1578-15, DOI 10.3141/1578-15]
[30]   A travel behavior analysis of urban cycling facilities in Montreal Canada [J].
Larsen, Jacob ;
El-Geneidy, Ahmed .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART D-TRANSPORT AND ENVIRONMENT, 2011, 16 (02) :172-177