Role of lumbar interspinous distraction on the neural elements

被引:27
作者
Alfieri, Alex [1 ]
Gazzeri, Roberto [3 ]
Prell, Julian [1 ]
Scheller, Christian [1 ]
Rachinger, Jens [1 ]
Strauss, Christian [1 ]
Schwarz, Andreas [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Halle Wittenberg, Dept Neurosurg, D-06120 Halle, Saale, Germany
[2] Cent Gen Hosp, Bolzano, South Tyrol, Italy
[3] San Giovanni Addolorata Hosp, Rome, Italy
关键词
Interspinous devices; Degenerative lumbar spine; Biomechanics of instability; NEUROGENIC INTERMITTENT CLAUDICATION; ADJACENT SEGMENT DEGENERATION; X-STOP DEVICE; PROCESS DECOMPRESSION SYSTEM; VIVO ANIMAL-MODEL; OF-THE-LITERATURE; LOW-BACK-PAIN; SPINAL STENOSIS; IN-VIVO; INTERVERTEBRAL DISC;
D O I
10.1007/s10143-012-0394-1
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
100204 [神经病学];
摘要
The interspinous distraction devices are used to treat variable pathologies ranging from facet syndrome, diskogenic low back pain, degenerative spinal stenosis, diskopathy, spondylolisthesis, and instability. The insertion of a posterior element with an interspinous device (ISD) is commonly judged responsive to a relative kyphosis of a lumbar segment with a moderate but persistent increase of the spinal canal and of the foraminal width and area, and without influence on low-grade spondylolisthesis. The consequence is the need of shared specific biomechanical concepts to give for each degenerative problem the right indication through a critical analysis of all available experimental and clinical biomechanical data. We reviewed systematically the available clinical and experimental data about kyphosis, enlargement of the spinal canal, distraction of the interspinous distance, increase of the neural foramina, ligamentous structures, load of the posterior annulus, intradiskal pressure, strength of the spinous processes, degeneration of the adjacent segment, complications, and cost-effectiveness of the ISD. The existing literature does not provide actual scientific evidence over the superiority of the ISD strategy, but most of the experimental and clinical data show a challenging potential. These considerations are applicable with different types of ISD with only few differences between the different categories. Despite-or because of-the low invasiveness of the surgical implantation of the ISD, this technique promises to play a major role in the future degenerative lumbar microsurgery. The main indications for ISD remain lumbar spinal stenoses and painful facet arthroses. A clear documented contraindication is the presence of an anterolisthesis. Nevertheless, the existing literature does not provide evidence of superiority of outcome and cost-effectiveness of the ISD strategy over laminectomy or other surgical procedures. At this time, the devices should be used in clinical randomized independent trials in order to obtain more information concerning the most advantageous optimal indication or, in selected cases, to treat tailored indications.
引用
收藏
页码:477 / 484
页数:8
相关论文
共 103 条
[1]
Biomechanical comparison of three fixation techniques for unstable thoracolumbar burst fractures [J].
Acosta, Frank L., Jr. ;
Buckley, Jenni M. ;
Xu, Zheng ;
Lotz, Jeffrey C. ;
Ames, Christopher P. .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2008, 8 (04) :341-346
[2]
THE RESISTANCE TO FLEXION OF THE LUMBAR INTERVERTEBRAL JOINT [J].
ADAMS, MA ;
HUTTON, WC ;
STOTT, JRR .
SPINE, 1980, 5 (03) :245-253
[3]
Treatment of neurogenic claudication by interspinous decompression: application of the X STOP device in patients with lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis [J].
Anderson, Paul A. ;
Tribus, Cliff B. ;
Kitchel, Scott H. .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2006, 4 (06) :463-471
[4]
The "Sandwich Phenomenon": A Rare Complication in Adjacent, Double-Level X-Stop Surgery Report of Three Cases and Review of the Literature [J].
Barbagallo, Giuseppe M. V. ;
Corbino, Leonardo A. ;
Olindo, Giuseppe ;
Foti, Pietro ;
Albanese, Vincenzo ;
Signorelli, Francesco .
SPINE, 2010, 35 (03) :E96-E100
[5]
ANALYSIS OF COMPLICATIONS IN PATIENTS TREATED WITH THE X-STOP INTERSPINOUS PROCESS DECOMPRESSION SYSTEM: PROPOSAL FOR A NOVEL ANATOMIC SCORING SYSTEM FOR PATIENT SELECTION AND REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE [J].
Barbagallo, Giuseppe M. V. ;
Olindo, Giuseppe ;
Corbino, Leonardo ;
Albanese, Vincenzo .
NEUROSURGERY, 2009, 65 (01) :111-120
[6]
Interspinous process devices in the lumbar spine [J].
Bono, Christopher M. ;
Vaccaro, Alexander R. .
JOURNAL OF SPINAL DISORDERS & TECHNIQUES, 2007, 20 (03) :255-261
[7]
Dynamic interspinous process stabilization: review of complications associated with the X-Stop device [J].
Bowers, Christian ;
Amini, Amin ;
Dailey, Andrew T. ;
Schmidt, Meic H. .
NEUROSURGICAL FOCUS, 2010, 28 (06) :1-6
[8]
Brantigan John W, 2004, Spine J, V4, P681, DOI 10.1016/j.spinee.2004.05.253
[9]
Cost-effectiveness of current treatment strategies for lumbar spinal stenosis: nonsurgical care, laminectomy, and X-STOP Clinical article [J].
Burnett, Mark G. ;
Stein, Sherman C. ;
Bartels, Ronald H. M. A. .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2010, 13 (01) :39-46
[10]
The short- and mid-term effect of dynamic interspinous distraction in the treatment of recurrent lumbar facet joint pain [J].
Cabraja, Mario ;
Abbushi, Alexander ;
Woiciechowsky, Christian ;
Kroppenstedt, Stefan .
EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2009, 18 (11) :1686-1694