Biomechanical comparison of three fixation techniques for unstable thoracolumbar burst fractures

被引:26
作者
Acosta, Frank L., Jr. [1 ,2 ]
Buckley, Jenni M. [2 ]
Xu, Zheng [2 ]
Lotz, Jeffrey C. [2 ]
Ames, Christopher P. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Neurol Surg, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
[2] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Orthopaed Surg, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
关键词
biomechanical study; burst fracture; cadaver; fixation fusion; instrumentation; lumbar spine; spinal stability;
D O I
10.3171/SPI/2008/8/4/341
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Object. Increased structural stability is considered sufficient justification for higher-risk surgical procedures, such as circumferential fixation after severe spinal destabilization. However, there is little biomechanical evidence to support such claims, particularly after traumatic lumbar burst fracture. The authors sought out to compare the biomechanical performance of the following 3 fixation strategies for spinal reconstruction after decompression for an unstable thoracolumbar burst fracture: 1) short-segment anterolateral fixation; 2) circumferential fixation; and 3) extended anterolateral fixation. Methods. Thoracolumbar spines (T10-1-4) from 7 donors (mean age at death 64 6 years; 1 female and 6 males) were tested in pure moment loading in flexion-extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation. Thoracolumbar burst fractures were surgically induced at L-1, and testing was repeated sequentially for each of the following fixation techniques: short-segment anterolateral, circumferential, and extended anterolateral. Primary and coupled 3D motions were measured across the instrumented site (T12-1-2) and compared across treatment groups. Results. Circumferential and extended anterolateral fixations were statistically equivalent for primary and off-axis range-of-motions in all loading directions, and short-segment anterolateral fixation offered significantly less rigidity than the other 2 methods. Conclusions. The results of this study strongly suggest that extended anterolateral fixation is biomechanically comparable to circumferential fusion in the treatment of unstable thoracolumbar burst fractures with posterior column and posterior ligamentous injury. In cases in which an anterior procedure may be favored for load sharing or canal decompression, extension of the anterior instrumentation and fusion one level above and below the unstable segment can result in near equivalent stability to a 2-stage circumferential procedure.
引用
收藏
页码:341 / 346
页数:6
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]
Biomechanical comparison of anterolateral plate, lateral plate, and pedicle screws-rods for enhancing anterolateral lumbar interbody cage stabilization [J].
Bozkus, H ;
Chamberlain, RH ;
Garza, LEP ;
Crawford, NR ;
Dickman, CA .
SPINE, 2004, 29 (06) :635-641
[2]
Anterolateral dynamized instrumentation and fusion for unstable thoracolumbar and lumbar burst fractures [J].
Carl, AL ;
Tranmer, BI ;
Sachs, BL .
SPINE, 1997, 22 (06) :686-690
[3]
Biomechanical effects of the body augmenter for reconstruction of the vertebral body [J].
Chen, HH ;
Wang, WK ;
Li, KC ;
Chen, TH .
SPINE, 2004, 29 (18) :E382-E387
[4]
Biomechanical study of anterior spinal instrumentation configurations [J].
Cloutier, Luc P. ;
Aubin, Carl-Eric ;
Grimard, Guy .
EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2007, 16 (07) :1039-1045
[5]
AN APPARATUS FOR APPLYING PURE NONCONSTRAINING MOMENTS TO SPINE SEGMENTS IN-VITRO [J].
CRAWFORD, NR ;
BRANTLEY, AGU ;
DICKMAN, CA ;
KOENEMAN, EJ .
SPINE, 1995, 20 (19) :2097-2100
[6]
Biomechanical testing of anterior and posterior thoracolumbar instrumentation in the cadaveric spine - Invited submission from the Joint Section Meeting on Disorders of the Spine and Peripheral Nerves, March 2004 [J].
Eichholz, KM ;
Hitchon, PW ;
From, A ;
Rubenbauer, P ;
Nakamura, S ;
Lim, TH ;
Torner, J .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2004, 1 (01) :116-121
[7]
EVALUATION OF SURGICAL-TREATMENT FOR BURST FRACTURES [J].
ESSES, SI ;
BOTSFORD, DJ ;
KOSTUIK, JP .
SPINE, 1990, 15 (07) :667-673
[8]
Biomechanical analysis of anterior scoliosis instrumentation - Differences between single and dual rod systems with and without interbody structural support [J].
Fricka, KB ;
Mahar, AT ;
Newton, PO .
SPINE, 2002, 27 (07) :702-706
[9]
Biomechanical assessment of anterior lumbar interbody fusion with an anterior lumbosacral fixation screw-plate: Comparison to stand-alone anterior lumbar interbody fusion and anterior lumbar interbody fusion with pedicle screws in an unstable human cadaver model [J].
Gerber, M ;
Crawford, NR ;
Chamberlain, RH ;
Fifield, MS ;
LeHuec, JC ;
Dickman, CA .
SPINE, 2006, 31 (07) :762-768
[10]
Biomechanical analysis of multilevel fixation methods in the lumbar spine [J].
Glazer, PA ;
Colliou, O ;
Klisch, SM ;
Bradford, DS ;
Bueff, HU ;
Lotz, JC .
SPINE, 1997, 22 (02) :171-182