Affinity ultrafiltration: Effects of ligand binding on selectivity and process optimization

被引:13
作者
Romero, J [1 ]
Zydney, AL [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Delaware, Dept Chem Engn, Newark, DE 19716 USA
关键词
affinity ultrafiltration; membrane; diafiltration; binding interactions;
D O I
10.1002/bit.10070
中图分类号
Q81 [生物工程学(生物技术)]; Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 0836 ; 090102 ; 100705 ;
摘要
The effective design of affinity ultrafiltration processes using a selective macroligand requires a detailed understanding of the effects of ligand-binding interactions on product yield and purification. Theoretical calculations were performed to evaluate the performance of affinity diafiltration separations with both competitive and independent binding interactions for the product and impurity. The intrinsic selectivity for independent binding decreased during the diafiltration due to the increase in fractional impurity binding as the impurity is selectively removed. The opposite behavior was seen for competitive binding because the strongly bound product displaces the impurity from the binding sites. Purification-yield diagrams were used to examine the effects of affinity-ligand concentration and binding constants on the separation. Model calculations were in excellent agreement with experimental data for the separation of tryptophan isomers using bovine serum albumin as the steroselective macroligand. Simulations with a fixed number of diavolumes show a clear optimum in product yield and purification factor at an intermediate ligand concentration due to the competing effects of the intrinsic selectivity and the rate of impurity removal. These results provide an appropriate framework for the design and optimization of affinity ultrafiltration systems. (C) 2002 John Wiley Sons, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:256 / 265
页数:10
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]  
DORDICK S, 1991, APPL BIOCHEM BIOTECH, V27, P93
[2]   Enantiomeric separation by ultrafiltration: complexation mechanism of tryptophan analogs to bovine serum albumin [J].
Garnier, F ;
Randon, J ;
Rocca, JL .
SEPARATION AND PURIFICATION TECHNOLOGY, 1999, 16 (03) :243-250
[3]   Modeling and simulation of the washing phase of an affinity ultrafiltration system [J].
Ghosh, R ;
Sanyal, SK ;
Mukherjea, RN ;
Bhattacharya, P .
SEPARATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 1996, 31 (01) :125-131
[4]   Modeling and analysis of the affinity filtration process, including broth feeding, washing, and elution steps [J].
He, LZ ;
Dong, XY ;
Sun, Y .
BIOTECHNOLOGY PROGRESS, 1998, 14 (04) :594-600
[5]   AFFINITY CROSS-FLOW FILTRATION - EXPERIMENTAL AND MODELING WORK USING THE SYSTEM OF HSA AND CIBACRON BLUE-AGAROSE [J].
HERAK, DC ;
MERRILL, EW .
BIOTECHNOLOGY PROGRESS, 1989, 5 (01) :9-17
[6]   AFFINITY CROSS-FLOW FILTRATION - SOME NEW ASPECTS [J].
HERAK, DC ;
MERRILL, EW .
BIOTECHNOLOGY PROGRESS, 1990, 6 (01) :33-40
[7]   SURFACE MODIFIED POLYSULFONE MEMBRANES - SEPARATION OF MIXED PROTEINS AND OPTICAL RESOLUTION OF TRYPTOPHAN [J].
HIGUCHI, A ;
ISHIDA, Y ;
NAKAGAWA, T .
DESALINATION, 1993, 90 (1-3) :127-136
[8]   OPTICAL RESOLUTION OF AMINO-ACIDS BY ULTRAFILTRATION MEMBRANES CONTAINING SERUM-ALBUMIN [J].
HIGUCHI, A ;
HARA, M ;
HORIUCHI, T ;
NAKAGAWA, T .
JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE, 1994, 93 (02) :157-164
[9]   THE AFFINITY TECHNOLOGY IN DOWNSTREAM PROCESSING [J].
LABROU, N ;
CLONIS, YD .
JOURNAL OF BIOTECHNOLOGY, 1994, 36 (02) :95-119
[10]   A CONTINUOUS AFFINITY ULTRAFILTRATION PROCESS FOR TRYPSIN PURIFICATION [J].
LUONG, JHT ;
MALE, KB ;
NGUYEN, AL .
BIOTECHNOLOGY AND BIOENGINEERING, 1988, 31 (06) :516-520