Genome signature comparisons among prokaryote, plasmid, and mitochondrial DNA

被引:188
作者
Campbell, A [1 ]
Mrázek, J
Karlin, S
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Dept Sci Biol, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[2] Stanford Univ, Dept Math, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1073/pnas.96.16.9184
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Our basic observation is that each genome has a characteristic "signature" defined as the ratios between the observed dinucleotide frequencies and the frequencies expected if neighbors were chosen at random (dinucleotide relative abundances). The remarkable fact is that the signature is relatively constant throughout the genome; i.e., the patterns and levels of dinucleotide relative abundances of every 50-kb segment of the genome are about the same. Comparison of the signatures of different genomes provides a measure of similarity which has the advantage that it looks at all the DNA of an organism and does not depend on the ability to align homologous sequences of specific genes. Genome signature comparisons show that plasmids, both specialized and broad-range, and their hosts have substantially compatible (similar) genome signatures. Mammalian mitochondrial (Mt) genomes are very similar, and animal and fungal Mt are generally moderately similar, but they diverge significantly from plant and protist Mt sets. Moreover, Mt genome signature differences between species parallel the corresponding nuclear genome signature differences, despite large differences between Mt and host nuclear signatures. In signature terms, we find that the archaea are not a coherent clade, For example, Sulfolobus and Halobacterium are extremely divergent. There is no consistent pattern of signature differences among thermophiles. More generally, grouping prokaryotes by environmental criteria (e.g., habitat propensities, osmolarity tolerance, chemical conditions) reveals no correlations in genome signature.
引用
收藏
页码:9184 / 9189
页数:6
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]   SPECIFIC-PURPOSE PLASMID CLONING VECTORS .2. BROAD HOST RANGE, HIGH COPY NUMBER, RSF1010-DERIVED VECTORS, AND A HOST-VECTOR SYSTEM FOR GENE CLONING IN PSEUDOMONAS [J].
BAGDASARIAN, M ;
LURZ, R ;
RUCKERT, B ;
FRANKLIN, FCH ;
BAGDASARIAN, MM ;
FREY, J ;
TIMMIS, KN .
GENE, 1981, 16 (1-3) :237-247
[2]   Similarities and dissimilarities of phage genomes [J].
Blaisdell, BE ;
Campbell, AM ;
Karlin, S .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 1996, 93 (12) :5854-5859
[3]   Archaea and the prokaryote-to-eukaryote transition [J].
Brown, JR ;
Doolittle, WF .
MICROBIOLOGY AND MOLECULAR BIOLOGY REVIEWS, 1997, 61 (04) :456-+
[4]   New insights into the phylogeny of eukaryotes based on ciliate Hsp70 sequences [J].
Budin, K ;
Philippe, H .
MOLECULAR BIOLOGY AND EVOLUTION, 1998, 15 (08) :943-956
[5]   PERVASIVE CPG SUPPRESSION IN ANIMAL MITOCHONDRIAL GENOMES [J].
CARDON, LR ;
BURGE, C ;
CLAYTON, DA ;
KARLIN, S .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 1994, 91 (09) :3799-3803
[6]   Protein phylogenies and signature sequences: A reappraisal of evolutionary relationships among archaebacteria, eubacteria, and eukaryotes [J].
Gupta, RS .
MICROBIOLOGY AND MOLECULAR BIOLOGY REVIEWS, 1998, 62 (04) :1435-+
[7]   The origin of the eukaryotic cell [J].
Gupta, RS ;
Golding, GB .
TRENDS IN BIOCHEMICAL SCIENCES, 1996, 21 (05) :166-171
[8]  
JOSSE J, 1961, J BIOL CHEM, V236, P864
[9]   WHY IS CPG SUPPRESSED IN THE GENOMES OF VIRTUALLY ALL SMALL EUKARYOTIC VIRUSES BUT NOT IN THOSE OF LARGE EUKARYOTIC VIRUSES [J].
KARLIN, S ;
DOERFLER, W ;
CARDON, LR .
JOURNAL OF VIROLOGY, 1994, 68 (05) :2889-2897
[10]   Comparative DNA analysis across diverse genomes [J].
Karlin, S ;
Campbell, AM ;
Mrázek, J .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF GENETICS, 1998, 32 :185-225