IT project portfolio optimization: A risk management approach to software development governance

被引:8
作者
Bardhan, I. R. [1 ]
Kauffman, R. J. [2 ]
Naranpanawe, S. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas Dallas, Sch Management, Richardson, TX 75083 USA
[2] Arizona State Univ, WP Carey Sch Business, Tempe, AZ 85287 USA
[3] SAS Inst, Cary, NC 27513 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1147/JRD.2009.2039824
中图分类号
TP3 [计算技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Little research has examined how to prioritize a portfolio of software projects. When project interdependencies are considered, the complexity of prioritizing even a small number of projects poses computational and evaluative challenges. We develop a prioritization approach to integrate real option analysis with a project portfolio optimization model. Our approach makes information technology (IT) portfolio risk management and valuation a meaningful tool for managers. Using real-world data, we implement the portfolio optimization model in a computationally feasible manner and demonstrate the superiority of our integrated optimization model. Our approach helps managers to make effective decisions, such as for investments in a service-oriented architecture, to enable flexible IT capabilities. When adaptability is paramount to success, managers can utilize our methods to inform themselves about the optimal timing of technology adoption decisions. Managers should recognize that IT investment decisions consist of many contingencies, so it is important to balance project-specific risks with the potential value derived across a multiperiod horizon. This permits us to make a contribution to the emerging discipline of software development governance in support of senior management decision making.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 48 条
[11]  
Benaroch M, 2006, MIS QUART, V30, P827
[12]   On the valuation of multistage information technology investments embedding nested real options [J].
Benaroch, Michel ;
Shah, Sandeep ;
Jeffery, Mark .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 2006, 23 (01) :239-261
[13]  
Boehm B., 2004, Balancing agility and discipline: A guide for the perplexed
[14]  
CANTOR M, 2006, ESTIMATION VARIANCE
[15]  
Cantor M., 2007, RATIONAL EDGE
[16]   CHANCE-CONSTRAINED PROGRAMMING [J].
CHARNES, A ;
COOPER, WW .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 1959, 6 (01) :73-79
[17]  
CHULANI S, 2008, P 1 INT WORKSH SOFTW, P3
[18]   Justifying contingent information technology investments: Balancing the need for speed of action with certainty before action [J].
Clemons, EK ;
Gu, B .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 2003, 20 (02) :11-48
[19]  
CLEMONS EK, 1995, SLOAN MANAGE REV, V36, P61
[20]  
Cooper R G., 1997, Portfolio Management for New Products, Hamilton, ON, Innovation Research Centre