Corporate boards and outside stakeholders as determinants of environmental litigation

被引:294
作者
Kassinis, G [1 ]
Vafeas, N [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cyprus, Dept Publ & Business Adm, CY-1678 Nicosia, Cyprus
关键词
boards; outside stakeholders; environmental litigation;
D O I
10.1002/smj.230
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Each year, hundreds of firms are prosecuted for violating environmental laws and hundreds of millions of dollars in penalties are assessed. At the same time, a much larger number of firms escape the various costs associated with litigation by adhering to the provisions of the same laws and regulations. It is not a priori apparent why this dichotomy exists. In this paper we draw on corporate governance and stakeholder theories to empirically investigate environmental lawsuits. Specifically, we compare the pre-lawsuit profile of 209 violators to a sample of matched control firms between 1994 and 1998. We find that the likelihood of becoming a lawsuit defendant increases with board size, with the fraction of directors in industrial firms, and with the fraction of inside ownership, and decreases with the number of directorships held by outside directors. These findings are robust to alternative dependent variable specifications. Together, our results suggest that managers, researchers, and policy-makers need to direct their attention to the corporate board as the core decision-making unit forming corporate environmental policies. Copyright (C) 2002 John Wiley Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:399 / 415
页数:17
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]   Who matters to CEOs? An investigation of stakeholder attributes and salience, corporate performance, and CEO values [J].
Agle, BR ;
Mitchell, RK ;
Sonnenfeld, JA .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 1999, 42 (05) :507-525
[2]  
Alexander C.R., 1999, Journal of Corporate Finance, V5, P1
[3]  
ANDREWS CJ, 1994, GEOGRAPHY ENV PREFER
[4]  
ANDREWS K, 1971, CONCEPT STRATEGY
[5]  
[Anonymous], EFFECTS HARMFUL ENV
[6]   Does stakeholder orientation matter? The relationship between stakeholder management models and firm financial performance [J].
Berman, SL ;
Wicks, AC ;
Kotha, S ;
Jones, TM .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 1999, 42 (05) :488-506
[7]  
BIRNBAUM PH, 1984, ACAD MANAGE J, V27, P489, DOI 10.5465/256041
[8]  
CLARKE RA, 1994, HARVARD BUS REV, V72, P37
[9]  
COLLIS DJ, 1995, HARVARD BUS REV, V73, P118
[10]  
Dalton DR, 1998, STRATEGIC MANAGE J, V19, P269, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199803)19:3<269::AID-SMJ950>3.3.CO