Quantity Flexibility Contract in the Presence of Discount Incentive

被引:37
作者
Chung, Wenming [1 ]
Talluri, Srinivas [2 ]
Narasimhan, Ram [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas El Paso, Coll Business, Mkt & Management Dept, El Paso, TX 79968 USA
[2] Michigan State Univ, Dept Supply Chain Management, Eli Broad Grad Sch Management, E Lansing, MI 48824 USA
关键词
Inventory Risk; Price-Only Contract; Profit Split; Quantity Flexibility Contract; Supply Chain Coordination; DECENTRALIZED SUPPLY CHAINS; COORDINATION; DECISIONS; GOODS;
D O I
10.1111/deci.12058
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
We design a new contract, which we refer to as the QFi contract, that combines the quantity flexibility (QF) mechanism and the price-only discount incentive. Under the QF contract, the buyer does not assume full responsibility for the forecast, yet the supplier guarantees the availability of the forecasted quantity and extra buffer inventory. In contrast, the price-only discount contract places full inventory burden on the buyer. We show that the proposed QFi contract effectively balances the inventory risk for both the buyer and the supplier considering both the QF and discount mechanisms. We also show that the QFi contract is able to achieve supply chain coordination. More importantly, the QFi contract's coordinating price scheme does not require knowledge of demand distribution. We identify areas where the buyer and supplier may both benefit from implementing the QFi contract as opposed to the extant QF or price-only (wholesale) discount contractual decisions in a decentralized supply chain. We also specify the conditions under which supply chain coordination can be achieved in a win-win manner. We conclude with managerial implications and provide directions for future research.
引用
收藏
页码:49 / 79
页数:31
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]   Quantity discounts under demand uncertainty [J].
Altintas, Nihat ;
Erhun, Feryal ;
Tayur, Sridhar .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2008, 54 (04) :777-792
[2]  
Barnes-Schuster D., 2002, Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, V4, P171, DOI 10.1287/msom.4.3.171.7754
[3]   Analysis of supply contracts with total minimum commitment [J].
Bassok, Y ;
Anupindi, R .
IIE TRANSACTIONS, 1997, 29 (05) :373-381
[4]   Decentralized supply chains with competing retailers under demand uncertainty [J].
Bernstein, F ;
Federgruen, A .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2005, 51 (01) :18-29
[5]  
Cachon GP, 2003, HDBK OPER R, V11, P229, DOI 10.1016/s0927-0507(03)11006-7
[6]   Supply chain coordination with revenue-sharing contracts: Strengths and limitations [J].
Cachon, GP ;
Lariviere, MA .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2005, 51 (01) :30-44
[7]   The allocation of inventory risk in a supply chain: Push, pull, and advance-purchase discount contracts [J].
Cachon, GP .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2004, 50 (02) :222-238
[8]   Auctioning supply contracts [J].
Chen, Fangruo .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2007, 53 (10) :1562-1576
[9]   A GAME-THEORETIC APPROACH TO QUANTITY DISCOUNT PROBLEMS [J].
CHIANG, WC ;
FITZSIMMONS, J ;
HUANG, Z ;
LI, SX .
DECISION SCIENCES, 1994, 25 (01) :153-168
[10]   Flexibility or Cost Saving? Sourcing Decisions with Two Suppliers [J].
Chung, Wenming ;
Talluri, Srinivas ;
Narasimhan, Ram .
DECISION SCIENCES, 2010, 41 (03) :623-650