Magnetic resonance imaging of the ankle at 3.0 Tesla and 1.5 Tesla in human cadaver specimens with artificially created lesions of cartilage and ligaments

被引:38
作者
Bauer, Jan S. [1 ,2 ,4 ]
Barr, Cameron [4 ]
Henning, Tobias D. [4 ]
Malfair, David [4 ]
Ma, C. Benjamin [3 ]
Steinbach, Lynne [4 ]
Link, Thomas M. [4 ]
机构
[1] Tech Univ Munich, Inst Rontgendiagnost, D-81675 Munich, Germany
[2] Tech Univ, Dept Radiol, Munich, Germany
[3] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Orthoped Surg, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
[4] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Radiol, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
关键词
ankle joint; cartilage; ligaments; 3.0; Tesla; sensitivity and specificity; MR; ankle sprains; osteoarthritis;
D O I
10.1097/RLI.0b013e31817e9ada
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 [临床医学]; 100207 [影像医学与核医学]; 1009 [特种医学];
摘要
Purpose: To compare magnetic resonance imaging of the ankle joint at 1.5 Tesla (T) and 3.0 T in the assessment of cartilage and ligament pathology in fresh human cadaver specimens. Materials and Methods: The study was performed in line with institutional and legislative requirements; all donors had dedicated their body for educational and research purposes before death. Thirteen fresh human cadaver ankle joints were imaged at 1.5 T and 3.0 T using an optimized clinical ankle protocol consisting of T1-weighted (T1-w), fat-saturated (fs) T2-w, and short T inversion recovery fast spinecho (FSE) sequences. For dedicated cartilage imaging, fs-intermediate (IM)-w FSE, fs-spoiled gradient echo, and balanced free precession steady state sequences were acquired. Artificial cartilage and ligament lesions were created in 6 and 5 specimens, respectively. MR imaging was repeated in those ankles. Four radiologists independently assessed pathology in all image datasets. Macroscopic findings after dissection served as a reference standard. Results: Sensitivities and ROC-values were higher at 3.0 T for detecting cartilage pathology (sensitivity up to 0.71 at 3.0 T vs. 0.49 at 1.5 T; A, up to 0.88 vs. 0.74; both differences P < 0.05) and highest for the fs-IM FSE sequence at 3.0 T. Average sensitivity for detecting ligament pathology was higher at 3.0 T (0.69 vs. 0.50; P < 0.05). Specificity was high among all protocols and both field strengths for assessing ligament and cartilage pathology (>0.95). Conclusion: Compared with 1.5-T imaging, the 3.0-T imaging of the ankle joint at improved diagnostic performance in assessing cartilage significantly and there was a higher sensitivity for assessing ligamentous pathology.
引用
收藏
页码:604 / 611
页数:8
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]
Effect of foot and ankle MR imaging on clinical decision making [J].
Anzilotti, K ;
Schweitzer, ME ;
Hecht, P ;
Wapner, K ;
Kahn, M ;
Ross, M .
RADIOLOGY, 1996, 201 (02) :515-517
[2]
MR imaging of the ankle at 3 Tesla and 1.5 Tesla: protocol optimization and application to cartilage, ligament and tendon pathology in cadaver specimens [J].
Barr, Cameron ;
Bauer, Jan S. ;
Malfair, David ;
Ma, Benjamin ;
Henning, Tobias D. ;
Steinbach, Lynne ;
Link, Thomas M. .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2007, 17 (06) :1518-1528
[3]
Barr Karen P, 2005, Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am, V16, P779, DOI 10.1016/j.pmr.2005.02.001
[4]
Volumetric cartilage measurements of porcine knee at 1.5-T and 3.0-T MR imaging: Evaluation of precision and accuracy [J].
Bauer, Jan S. ;
Krause, Stefanie J. ;
Ross, Christian J. ;
Krug, Roland ;
Carballido-Gamio, Julio ;
Ozhinsky, Eugene ;
Majumdar, Sharmila ;
Link, Thomas M. .
RADIOLOGY, 2006, 241 (02) :399-406
[5]
BUSSE RF, 2006, RAD 2006 RSNA ANN M, V241, P218
[6]
Ankle MR arthrography:: how, why, when [J].
Cerezal, L ;
Abascal, F ;
García-Valtuille, O ;
Canga, A .
RADIOLOGIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2005, 43 (04) :693-+
[7]
CHRONIC ANKLE INSTABILITY - EVALUATION WITH MR ARTHROGRAPHY, MR-IMAGING, AND STRESS RADIOGRAPHY [J].
CHANDNANI, VP ;
HARPER, MT ;
FICKE, JR ;
GAGLIARDI, JA ;
ROLLING, L ;
CHRISTENSEN, KP ;
HANSEN, MF .
RADIOLOGY, 1994, 192 (01) :189-194
[8]
Cartilage thickness in cadaveric ankles: Measurement with double-contrast multi-detector row CT arthrography versus MR imaging [J].
El-Khoury, GY ;
Alliman, KJ ;
Lundberg, HJ ;
Rudert, MJ ;
Brown, TD ;
Saltzman, CL .
RADIOLOGY, 2004, 233 (03) :768-773
[9]
Anterolateral impingement of the ankle: Effectiveness of MR imaging [J].
Farooki, S ;
Yao, L ;
Seeger, LL .
RADIOLOGY, 1998, 207 (02) :357-360
[10]
FELSON DT, 1995, OSTEOARTHRITIS DISOR