MR imaging of the ankle at 3 Tesla and 1.5 Tesla: protocol optimization and application to cartilage, ligament and tendon pathology in cadaver specimens

被引:79
作者
Barr, Cameron
Bauer, Jan S.
Malfair, David
Ma, Benjamin
Henning, Tobias D.
Steinbach, Lynne
Link, Thomas M.
机构
[1] Tech Univ Munich, Klinikum Rechts Isar, Dept Radiol, D-81675 Munich, Germany
[2] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Radiol, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
[3] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Orthoped Surg, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
关键词
ankle joint; cartilage; tendons; 3.0 Tesla MRI; comparative studies;
D O I
10.1007/s00330-006-0446-4
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 [临床医学]; 100207 [影像医学与核医学]; 1009 [特种医学];
摘要
The objective of this study was to optimize ankle joint MR imaging in volunteers at 1.5 Tesla (T) and 3.0 T, and to compare these optimized sequences concerning image quality and performance in assessing cartilage, ligament and tendon pathology in fresh human cadaver specimens. Initially our clinical ankle protocol consisting of T1-weighted (-w), fat-saturated (fs) T2-w, and short tau inversion-recovery fast spinecho (FSE) sequences was optimized at 1.5 T and 3.0 T by two radiologists. For dedicated cartilage imaging, fs-intermediate (IM)-w FSE, fs spoiled gradient echo, and balanced free-precession steady-state sequences were optimized. Using the optimized sequences, thirteen cadaver ankle joints were imaged. Four radiologists independently assessed these images concerning image quality and pathology. All radiologists consistently rated image quality higher at 3.0 T (all sequences p < 0.05). For detecting cartilage pathology, diagnostic performance was significantly higher at 3.0 T (ROC-values up to 0.93 vs. 0.77; p < 0.05); the fs-IM FSE sequence showed highest values among the different sequences. Average sensitivity for detecting tendon pathology was 63% at 3.0 T vs. 41% at 1.5 T and was significantly higher at 3.0 T for 2 out of 4 radiologists (p < 0.05). Compared to 1.5 T, imaging of the ankle joint at 3.0 T significantly improved image quality and diagnostic performance in assessing cartilage pathology.
引用
收藏
页码:1518 / 1528
页数:11
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]
Imaging articular cartilage defects in the ankle joint with 3D fat-suppressed echo planar imaging: Comparison with conventional 3D fat-suppressed gradient echo imaging [J].
Ba-Ssalamah, A ;
Schibany, N ;
Puig, S ;
Herneth, AM ;
Noebauer-Huhmann, IM ;
Trattnig, S .
JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2002, 16 (02) :209-216
[2]
FLAIR imaging for multiple sclerosis:: a comparative MR study at 1.5 and 3.0 Tesla [J].
Bachmann, R ;
Reilmann, R ;
Schwindt, W ;
Kugel, H ;
Heindel, W ;
Krämer, S .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2006, 16 (04) :915-921
[3]
Baker J M, 2000, Foot Ankle Clin, V5, P887
[4]
Ankle pain and peroneal tendon pathology [J].
Baumhauer, JF ;
Nawoczenski, DA ;
DiGiovanni, BF ;
Flemister, AS .
CLINICS IN SPORTS MEDICINE, 2004, 23 (01) :21-+
[5]
Bencardino J T, 2001, Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am, V9, P447
[6]
Characterization of patients with primary peroneus longus tendinopathy: A review of twenty-two cases [J].
Brandes, CB ;
Smith, RW .
FOOT & ANKLE INTERNATIONAL, 2000, 21 (06) :462-468
[7]
Signal-to-noise ratio and absorbed power as functions of main magnetic field strength, and definition of "90°" RF pulse for the head in the birdcage coil [J].
Collins, CM ;
Smith, MB .
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 2001, 45 (04) :684-691
[8]
Cartilage thickness in cadaveric ankles: Measurement with double-contrast multi-detector row CT arthrography versus MR imaging [J].
El-Khoury, GY ;
Alliman, KJ ;
Lundberg, HJ ;
Rudert, MJ ;
Brown, TD ;
Saltzman, CL .
RADIOLOGY, 2004, 233 (03) :768-773
[9]
Magnetic resonance imaging of hyaline cartilage defects at 1.5T and 3.0T:: comparison of medium T2-weighted fast spin echo, T1-weighted two-dimensional and three-dimensional gradient echo pulse sequences [J].
Fischbach, F ;
Bruhn, H ;
Unterhauser, F ;
Ricke, J ;
Wieners, G ;
Felix, R ;
Weiler, A ;
Schröder, RJ .
ACTA RADIOLOGICA, 2005, 46 (01) :67-73
[10]
Musculoskeletal MRI at 3.0T: Initial clinical experience [J].
Gold, GE ;
Suh, B ;
Sawyer-Glover, A ;
Beaulieu, C .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2004, 183 (05) :1479-1486