Palliative care program effectiveness research: Developing rigor in sampling design, conduct, and reporting

被引:29
作者
Bakitas, MA
Lyons, KD
Dixon, J
Ahles, TA
机构
[1] Dartmouth Hitchcock Med Ctr, Norris Cotton Canc Ctr, Lebanon, NH 03756 USA
[2] Yale Univ, New Haven, CT USA
关键词
palliative care; sample; research methods; sampling issues; program effectiveness; randomized clinical trial;
D O I
10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2005.07.011
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Research on palliative care Presents some unique sampling challenges. The purpose of this Paper is to articulate the sampling challenges that palliative care researchers face during phases of study design, conduct, and, the reporting of results. Challenges include identifying a target, population, avoiding selection bias in the face of clinician and patient denial of serious illness, developing eligibility criteria for a seriously ill population, minimizing high patient refusals due to illness, and accurate reporting of all screened and eligible participants. These challenges are explored within, the context of a randomized clinical trial testing a palliative care intervention. Suggestions for improving scientific rigor in sampling design include 1) defining a target population. that, is consistent with research goals; 2) identifying eligibility criteria that are objective and understandable to clinicians to yield the desired sample; and, 3) reporting results about the target population, sample eligibility/ exclusions, and participation using standardized criteria.
引用
收藏
页码:270 / 284
页数:15
相关论文
共 75 条
[41]   Clinical research in palliative care: patient populations, symptoms, interventions and endpoints [J].
Mazzocato, C ;
Sweeney, C ;
Bruera, E .
PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2001, 15 (02) :163-168
[42]  
McMillan Susan C, 2003, Oncol Nurs Forum, V30, P123, DOI 10.1188/03.ONF.123-129
[43]   Judging the quality of care at the end of life: can proxies provide reliable information? [J].
McPherson, CJ ;
Addington-Hall, JM .
SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2003, 56 (01) :95-109
[44]   EVALUATION OF A PALLIATIVE CARE SERVICE - PROBLEMS AND PITFALLS [J].
MCWHINNEY, IR ;
BASS, MJ ;
DONNER, A .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1994, 309 (6965) :1340-1342
[45]   A concept analysis of palliative care in the United States [J].
Meghani, SH .
JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 2004, 46 (02) :152-161
[46]   United States: Overview of cancer pain and palliative care [J].
Meier, DE .
JOURNAL OF PAIN AND SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT, 2002, 24 (02) :265-269
[47]   Estimating prognosis for nursing home residents with advanced dementia [J].
Mitchell, SL ;
Kiely, DK ;
Hamel, MB ;
Park, PS ;
Morris, JN ;
Fries, BE .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2004, 291 (22) :2734-2740
[48]   The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials [J].
Moher, D ;
Schulz, KF ;
Altman, DG .
LANCET, 2001, 357 (9263) :1191-1194
[49]   Late referrals to specialized palliative care service in Japan [J].
Morita, T ;
Akechi, T ;
Ikenaga, M ;
Kizawa, Y ;
Kohara, H ;
Mukaiyama, T ;
Nakaho, T ;
Nakashima, N ;
Shima, Y ;
Matsubara, T ;
Uchitomi, Y .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2005, 23 (12) :2637-2644
[50]  
*NAT CONS PROJ, 2004, CLIN PRACT GUID QUAL