Efficacy of endoscopic nasobiliary drainage for the prevention of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis and cholangitis after repeated clearance of common bile duct stones: Experience from a Chinese center

被引:85
作者
Yang, Jun [1 ]
Peng, Jia-yuan [1 ]
Pang, Er-jun [1 ]
Chen, Wei [1 ]
机构
[1] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Sch Med, Affiliated Peoples Hosp 6, Dept Surg, Shanghai 200233, Peoples R China
关键词
cholangitis; choledocholithiasis; endoscopic nasobiliary drainage (ENBD); endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP); pancreatitis; FOLLOW-UP; SPHINCTEROTOMY; COMPLICATIONS; MANAGEMENT; CHOLEDOCHOLITHIASIS; ERCP;
D O I
10.1111/den.12013
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
100201 [内科学];
摘要
BackgroundThe aim of the present study was to investigate whether it is reasonable to insert an endoscopic nasobiliary drainage (ENBD) tube in patients with endoscopic sphincterotomy (EST) and repeated clearance of common bile duct (CBD) stones. Patients and methodsPatients with choledocholithiasis who underwent EST and CBD stone clearance at our center from January 2010 to May 2012 were reviewed. The following parameters were evaluated: (i) serum amylase 2 and 24h after ERCP; (ii) incidence of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP)-related pancreatitis and cholangitis; (iii) time elapsed to normalization of total serum bilirubin levels for those with jaundice before ERCP; and (iv) length of hospital stay. ResultsCompared with the no-ENBD group, the ENBD group presented a significantly lower postoperative serum amylase of 2 and 24h (81.331.8U/L vs 90.8 +/- 31.2U/L, 107.0 +/- 51.1U/Lvs 132.3 +/- 100.8U/L, respectively). The incidence of post-ERCP pancreatitis and cholangitis was also lower in the ENBD group, although the differences were not significant (1% vs 4.4%, 0 vs 4.5%, respectively). Time elapsed to normalization of total serum bilirubin levels and length of hospital stay was shorter in the ENBD group (4.3days +/- 0.6days vs 4.5days +/- 0.7days, P>0.05; 4.8days +/- 2.1days vs 6.3days +/- 2.8days, respectively, P<0.01). ConclusionsENBD significantly reduces the incidence of hyperamylasemia and decreases the length of hospital stay in patients with EST and repeated stone extraction. ENBD should be considered for patients with large or multiple CBD stones.
引用
收藏
页码:453 / 458
页数:6
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]
ENDOSCOPIC PAPILLOTOMY FOR COMMON BILE-DUCT STONES - FACTORS INFLUENCING THE COMPLICATION RATE [J].
BOENDER, J ;
NIX, GAJJ ;
DERIDDER, MAJ ;
VANBLANKENSTEIN, M ;
SCHUTTE, HE ;
DEES, J ;
WILSON, JHP .
ENDOSCOPY, 1994, 26 (02) :209-216
[2]
Long-term follow-up of patients after endoscopic sphincterotomy for choledocholithiasis, and risk factors for recurrence [J].
Costamagna, G ;
Tringali, A ;
Shah, SK ;
Mutignani, M ;
Zuccalà, G ;
Perri, V .
ENDOSCOPY, 2002, 34 (04) :273-279
[3]
Advances in pancreatobiliary endoscopy [J].
Cote, Gregory A. ;
Sherman, Stuart .
CURRENT OPINION IN GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2010, 26 (05) :429-435
[4]
ENDOSCOPIC SPHINCTEROTOMY COMPLICATIONS AND THEIR MANAGEMENT - AN ATTEMPT AT CONSENSUS [J].
COTTON, PB ;
LEHMAN, G ;
VENNES, J ;
GEENEN, JE ;
RUSSELL, RCG ;
MEYERS, WC ;
LIGUORY, C ;
NICKL, N .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 1991, 37 (03) :383-393
[5]
Infection after ERCP, and antibiotic prophylaxis: a sequential quality-improvement approach over 11 years [J].
Cotton, Peter B. ;
Connor, Patrick ;
Rawls, Elaine ;
Romagnuolo, Joseph .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2008, 67 (03) :471-475
[6]
Draganov Peter, 2005, JSLS, V9, P218
[7]
Complications of endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy [J].
Freeman, ML ;
Nelson, DB ;
Sherman, S ;
Haber, GB ;
Herman, ME ;
Dorsher, PJ ;
Moore, JP ;
Fennerty, MB ;
Ryan, ME ;
Shaw, MJ ;
Lande, JD ;
Pheley, AM .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1996, 335 (13) :909-918
[8]
Hochberger J, 2003, Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am, V13, P623, DOI 10.1016/S1052-5157(03)00102-8
[9]
ENDOSCOPIC SPHINCTEROTOMY - LONG-TERM RESULTS IN 408 PATIENTS WITH COMPLETE FOLLOW-UP [J].
IKEDA, S ;
TANAKA, M ;
MATSUMOTO, S ;
YOSHIMOTO, H ;
ITOH, H .
ENDOSCOPY, 1988, 20 (01) :13-17
[10]
Isayama H, 2006, DIG ENDOSC S1, V18, pS110, DOI [10.1111/j.1443-1661.2006.00646.x, DOI 10.1111/J.1443-1661.2006.00646.X]