Normal aging effects for frequency doubling technology perimetry

被引:59
作者
Adams, CW
Bullimore, MA
Wall, M
Fingeret, M
Johnson, CA [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Berkeley, Sch Optometry, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
[2] Ohio State Univ, Coll Optometry, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
[3] Univ Iowa, Dept Neurol, Iowa City, IA 52242 USA
[4] Vet Adm, New York, NY USA
[5] Legacy Hlth Syst, Devers Eye Inst, Discoveries Sight Res Lab, Portland, OR USA
关键词
perimetry; visual fields; aging; frequency doubling; contrast sensitivity;
D O I
10.1097/00006324-199908000-00027
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Purpose. To determine the influence of normal aging on contrast sensitivity for frequency doubling technology (FDT) perimetry. Methods. Contrast sensitivity measures were obtained for frequency-doubled stimuli (0.25 cycles per degree sinusoidal gratings undergoing 25 Hz counterphase flicker) at 17 target locations (4 per quadrant plus the central 5 degrees) using a prototype of the Welch Allyn (Skaneateles, NY)/Humphrey Systems FDT perimeter (Humphrey Systems, Dublin, CA). A total of 407 normal subjects (761 eyes) between the ages of 15 and 85 years were tested. Results. Between the ages of 15 and 60 years there was an approximately linear decrease in contrast sensitivity of 0.6 dB per decade. After the age of 70, there was a slightly greater sensitivity loss with age. There were no meaningful differences in sensitivity loss as a function of age for different visual field locations. A small but consistent reduction in contrast sensitivity (approximately 0.7 dB) was found at all visual field locations for the second eye tested that may be due to a central adaptation process. Conclusions. Normal aging effects for FDT perimetry are similar to those obtained for conventional automated perimetry, except that the FDT perimetry aging effects do not appear to be eccentricity dependent. These normative data provide a basis for establishing a statistical analysis procedure and probability plots for FDT perimetry.
引用
收藏
页码:582 / 587
页数:6
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]   THE NORMAL VISUAL-FIELD ON THE HUMPHREY FIELD ANALYZER [J].
BRENTON, RS ;
PHELPS, CD .
OPHTHALMOLOGICA, 1986, 193 (1-2) :56-74
[2]   TEST-RETEST VARIABILITY OF TOPOGRAPHIC MEASUREMENTS WITH CONFOCAL SCANNING LASER TOMOGRAPHY IN PATIENTS WITH GLAUCOMA AND CONTROL SUBJECTS [J].
CHAUHAN, BC ;
LEBLANC, RP ;
MCCORMICK, TA ;
ROGERS, JB .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1994, 118 (01) :9-15
[3]  
GLOVINSKY Y, 1991, INVEST OPHTH VIS SCI, V32, P484
[4]  
HEIJL A, 1987, ARCH OPHTHALMOL-CHIC, V105, P1544
[5]  
JAFFE GJ, 1986, ARCH OPHTHALMOL-CHIC, V104, P1021
[6]  
JOHNSON CA, 1989, INVEST OPHTH VIS SCI, V30, P2056
[7]  
Johnson CA, 1997, INVEST OPHTH VIS SCI, V38, P413
[8]  
JOHNSON CA, 1997, PERIMETRY UPDATE 199, P13
[9]   ON THE DEFINITION OF AGE-RELATED NORMS FOR VISUAL FUNCTION TESTING [J].
JOHNSON, MA ;
CHOY, D .
APPLIED OPTICS, 1987, 26 (08) :1449-1454
[10]   NON-LINEAR VISUAL RESPONSES TO FLICKERING SINUSOIDAL GRATINGS [J].
KELLY, DH .
JOURNAL OF THE OPTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 1981, 71 (09) :1051-1055