Activation and suppression of the sternocleidomastoid muscle induced by transcranial magnetic stimulation

被引:15
作者
Odergren, T
Rimpilainen, I
机构
[1] KAROLINSKA HOSP, DEPT CLIN NEUROPHYSIOL, S-10401 STOCKHOLM, SWEDEN
[2] TAMPERE UNIV TECHNOL, RAGNAR GRANIT INST, TAMPERE, FINLAND
来源
ELECTROMYOGRAPHY AND MOTOR CONTROL-ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY AND CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY | 1996年 / 101卷 / 02期
关键词
transcranial magnetic stimulation; sternocleidomastoid muscle; laterality of activation;
D O I
10.1016/0924-980X(95)00246-H
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
Responses in the sternocleidomastoid muscle (SCM) induced by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) were investigated in 10 healthy subjects. Stimuli were given with the Dantec MagLite(TM) magnetic stimulator using a 12.5 cm circular coil with counter-clockwise current direction. Monopolar needle electrodes with isolated shafts were used fbr simultaneous bilateral electromyographic (EMG) recordings of the SCM. TMS given on either side invariably induced an ipsilateral motor evoked potential of the SCM (SCM-MEP), whereas a contralateral SCM-MEP was just seen in 25% of the performed stimulation series also when maximal intensity was used, The SCM-MEPs recorded ipsilaterally to the side of stimulation had significantly higher maximal amplitudes (P < 0.05) compared to the SCM-MEPs recorded contralaterally (mean +/- S.D.: 1.0 +/- 0.5 and 0.2 +/- 0.1 mV, respectively). These results support the concept of a predominantly ipsilateral control of SCM activation. The contralateral SCM-MEPs tended to have a shorter latency than the ipsilateral SCM-MEPs. The thresholds of the ipsilateral SCM-MEPs were significantly higher (P < 0.01) on the left side than on the right side (mean +/- S.D.: 78 +/- 18 and 60 +/- 16 A/mu sec, respectively), which could be due to the consistent use of counter-clockwise coil current direction, TMS given on either side induced suppression of voluntary SCM activity in all investigated subjects. Responses induced by TMS given ipsilaterally and contralaterally to the voluntary activated muscle did not differ significantly (P greater than or equal to 0.05) regarding threshold or latency of the suppression.
引用
收藏
页码:175 / 180
页数:6
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]   UNDECUSSATED INNERVATION TO THE STERNOCLEIDOMASTOID MUSCLE - REINSTATEMENT [J].
BALAGURA, S ;
KATZ, RG .
ANNALS OF NEUROLOGY, 1980, 7 (01) :84-85
[2]   TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION OF THE HUMAN-BRAIN - RESPONSES IN MUSCLES SUPPLIED BY CRANIAL NERVES [J].
BENECKE, R ;
MEYER, BU ;
SCHONLE, P ;
CONRAD, B .
EXPERIMENTAL BRAIN RESEARCH, 1988, 71 (03) :623-632
[3]  
BENECKE R, 1991, ELECTROEN CLIN NEURO, P333
[4]   ACCESSORY NERVE - CONDUCTION STUDIES [J].
CHERINGTON, M .
ARCHIVES OF NEUROLOGY, 1968, 18 (06) :708-+
[5]   THE INFLUENCE OF STIMULUS TYPE ON THE MAGNETIC EXCITATION OF NERVE STRUCTURES [J].
CLAUS, D ;
MURRAY, NMF ;
SPITZER, A ;
FLUGEL, D .
ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY AND CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1990, 75 (04) :342-349
[6]   ACOUSTIC TRAUMA IN EXTRACRANIAL MAGNETIC BRAIN-STIMULATION [J].
COUNTER, SA ;
BORG, E ;
LOFQVIST, L .
ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY AND CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1991, 78 (03) :173-184
[7]  
DAY BL, 1990, J PHYSIOL-LONDON, V430, P617
[8]  
DAY BL, 1989, DISORDERS MOVEMENT, P543
[9]  
DUBINSKY RB, 1994, THERAPY BOTULINUM TO, P239
[10]   SILENT PERIOD MEASUREMENT REVIVES AS A VALUABLE DIAGNOSTIC-TOOL WITH TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION [J].
HAUG, BA ;
SCHONLE, PW ;
KNOBLOCH, C ;
KOHNE, M .
ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY AND CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1992, 85 (02) :158-160