Do increases in energy efficiency improve environmental quality and sustainability?

被引:143
作者
Hanley, Nick [3 ]
McGregor, Peter G. [1 ,2 ,4 ,5 ]
Swales, J. Kim [1 ,2 ,4 ,5 ]
Turner, Karen [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Strathclyde, Dept Econ, Glasgow G4 0GE, Lanark, Scotland
[2] Univ Strathclyde, Fraser Allander Inst, Glasgow G4 0GE, Lanark, Scotland
[3] Univ Stirling, Dept Econ, Stirling FK9 4LA, Scotland
[4] Univ Strathclyde, CPPR, Glasgow G1 1XQ, Lanark, Scotland
[5] Univ Glasgow, CPPR, Glasgow G12 8QQ, Lanark, Scotland
基金
英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;
关键词
Backfire; CGE models; Energy efficiency; Rebound; Resource productivity; Sustainability indicators; COMPUTABLE GENERAL EQUILIBRIUM; INPUT-OUTPUT-ANALYSIS; REGIONAL ECONOMY; UNITED-STATES; POLICY; MIGRATION; MODEL; SCOTLAND; IMPACT; TRADE;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.06.004
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Governments world-wide increasingly see energy efficiency as an important aspect of sustainability. However, there is a debate in the literature as to whether the impact of improved energy efficiency on reducing energy use might be partially, or more than wholly, offset through "rebound" and "backfire" effects. This paper clarifies the theoretical conditions under which such effects would occur and explores their likely significance using a computable general equilibrium (CGE) model of the Scottish economy. We find that for Scotland a general improvement in energy efficiency in the production sectors of the economy initially produces rebound effects that eventually grow into backfire. Energy use ultimately increases in response to an efficiency gain and the ratio of GDP to CO2 emissions falls. The economic factors underpinning rebound effects are straightforward: energy efficiency improvements result in an effective cut in energy prices, which produces output, substitution, competitiveness and income effects that stimulate energy demands. However, the presence of strong rebound or even backfire does not mean that efficiency-enhancing policies are irrelevant: rather it suggests that such policies operating alone are insufficient to generate environmental improvements. The implication is that a co-ordinated portfolio of energy policies is required. (C) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:692 / 709
页数:18
相关论文
共 47 条
[11]   AGGREGATE ENERGY, EFFICIENCY, AND PRODUCTIVITY MEASUREMENT [J].
BERNDT, ER .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF ENERGY, 1978, 3 :225-273
[12]   Prices, technology development and the rebound effect [J].
Birol, F ;
Keppler, JH .
ENERGY POLICY, 2000, 28 (6-7) :457-469
[13]  
Blanchflower D. G., 1994, The Wage Curve
[14]  
Broadstock D., 2007, REBOUND EFFECT ASSES
[15]   THE GREENHOUSE-EFFECT - THE FALLACIES IN THE ENERGY EFFICIENCY SOLUTION [J].
BROOKES, L .
ENERGY POLICY, 1990, 18 (02) :199-201
[16]   Quantifying central hypotheses on Environmental Kuznets Curves for a rich economy:: A computable general equilibrium study [J].
Bruvoll, A ;
Fæhn, T ;
Strom, B .
SCOTTISH JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 2003, 50 (02) :149-173
[17]  
*CAB OFF, 2001, RES PROD MAK MOR LES
[18]   CHOOSING ENVIRONMENTAL-POLICY INSTRUMENTS USING GENERAL EQUILIBRIUM-MODELS [J].
CONRAD, K ;
SCHRODER, M .
JOURNAL OF POLICY MODELING, 1993, 15 (5-6) :521-543
[19]  
Conrad K., 1999, Handbook of environmental and resource economics
[20]   ENERGY IN A REGIONAL ECONOMY - A COMPUTABLE GENERAL EQUILIBRIUM-MODEL FOR CALIFORNIA [J].
DESPOTAKIS, KA ;
FISHER, AC .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 1988, 15 (03) :313-330