Experimental methods: Eliciting risk preferences

被引:434
作者
Charness, Gary [1 ]
Gneezy, Uri [2 ,3 ]
Imas, Alex [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA 93106 USA
[2] Univ Calif San Diego, San Diego, CA 92103 USA
[3] Univ Amsterdam, CREED, NL-1012 WX Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
Risk preferences; Elicitation methods; Experimental methodology; CONSTRUCT-VALIDITY; GENDER-DIFFERENCES; TIME-PREFERENCES; TASK BART; ATTITUDES; AVERSION; DECISION;
D O I
10.1016/j.jebo.2012.12.023
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Economists and psychologists have developed a variety of experimental methodologies to elicit and assess individual risk attitudes. Choosing which to utilize, however, is largely dependent on the question one wants to answer, as well as the characteristics of the sample population. The goal of this paper is to present a series of prevailing methods for eliciting risk preferences and outline the advantages and disadvantages of each. We do not attempt to give a comprehensive account of all the methods or nuances of measuring risk, but rather to outline some advantages and disadvantages of different methods. (C) 2013 Published by Elsevier B.V.
引用
收藏
页码:43 / 51
页数:9
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]   Eliciting risk and time preferences [J].
Andersen, Steffen ;
Harrison, Glenn W. ;
Lau, Morten I. ;
Rutstrom, E. Elisabet .
ECONOMETRICA, 2008, 76 (03) :583-618
[2]   Elicitation using multiple price list formats (vol 9, pg 383, 2006) [J].
Andersen, Steffen ;
Harrison, Glenn W. ;
Lau, Morten Igel ;
Rutstrom, E. Elisabet .
EXPERIMENTAL ECONOMICS, 2009, 12 (01) :99-100
[3]   Are risk preferences stable? Comparing an experimental measure with a validated survey-based measure [J].
Anderson, Lisa R. ;
Mellor, Jennifer M. .
JOURNAL OF RISK AND UNCERTAINTY, 2009, 39 (02) :137-160
[4]   Estimating Time Preferences from Convex Budgets [J].
Andreoni, James ;
Sprenger, Charles .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2012, 102 (07) :3333-3356
[5]  
[Anonymous], INTEGRATION PE UNPUB
[6]   Testosterone and financial risk preferences [J].
Apicella, Coren L. ;
Dreber, Anna ;
Campbell, Benjamin ;
Gray, Peter B. ;
Hoffman, Moshe ;
Little, Anthony C. .
EVOLUTION AND HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 2008, 29 (06) :384-390
[7]  
Azrieli Y., 2012, INCENTIVES EXP UNPUB
[8]   ATTITUDES TOWARD RISK - THEORETICAL IMPLICATIONS OF AN EXPERIMENT IN RURAL INDIA [J].
BINSWANGER, HP .
ECONOMIC JOURNAL, 1981, 91 (364) :867-890
[9]   Differences in impulsivity and risk-taking propensity between primary users of crack cocaine and primary users of heroin in a residential substance-use program [J].
Bornovalova, MA ;
Daughters, SB ;
Hernandez, GD ;
Richards, JB ;
Lejuez, CW .
EXPERIMENTAL AND CLINICAL PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2005, 13 (04) :311-318
[10]   Construct Validity of the Iowa Gambling Task [J].
Buelow, Melissa T. ;
Suhr, Julie A. .
NEUROPSYCHOLOGY REVIEW, 2009, 19 (01) :102-114