Recent developments in the assessment of quality of life in Multiple Sclerosis (MS)

被引:224
作者
Fischer, JS
LaRocca, NG
Miller, DM
Ritvo, PG
Andrews, H
Paty, D
机构
[1] Cleveland Clin Fdn, Mellen Ctr MS Treatment & Res U10, Cleveland, OH 44195 USA
[2] Natl MS Soc, Hlth Care Delivery & Polciy Program, New York, NY 10017 USA
[3] Toronto Hosp, Dept Psychol, Toronto, ON M5G 2C4, Canada
[4] New York State Psychiat Inst & Hosp, New York, NY 10032 USA
[5] Univ British Columbia, Dept Neurol, Vancouver, BC V6T 2B5, Canada
关键词
multiple sclerosis; quality of life; outcome assessment MS Quality of Life Inventory (MSQLI); MS Quality of Life-54 (QOL-54); Functional Assessment of MS (FAMS);
D O I
10.1177/135245859900500410
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Multiple sclerosis (MS) and its treatment have broad-ranging effects on quality of life. This article reviews recent efforts to assess the impact of MS on activities of daily living (ADLs) and health-related quality of life (HRQL), and describes the development of the Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life Inventory (MSQLI). The MSQLI is a modular MS-specific HRQL instrument consisting of a widely-used generic measure, the Health Status Questionnaire (SF-36), supplemented by nine symptom-specific measures (covering fatigue, pain, bladder function, bowel function, emotional status, perceived cognitive function, visual function, sexual satisfaction, and social relationships). Content validation consisted of evaluating its adherence to a conceptual model of the impact of MS and review by MS specialists (neurologists and allied health professionals), HRQL experts, patients, and caregivers. The reliability and construct validity of the MSQLI were rigorously evaluated in a field test with 300 North American Patients (198 female 102 mole) with definite MS (Poser criteria) and a brood range of physical impairment (EDSS=0.0-8.5). This article concludes by comparing the MSQLI with two other MS-specific HRQL measures (MS Quality of Life-54 (QOL-54) and Functional Assessment of Multiple Sclerosis (FAMS)) and discussing key issues to consider in selecting on HRQL instrument for a collaborative database.
引用
收藏
页码:251 / 259
页数:9
相关论文
共 52 条
  • [21] *INT FED MS SOC, 1985, MIN REC DIS MULT SCL
  • [22] Development and testing of the medical outcomes study 36-item short form health survey summary scale scores in the United Kingdom - Results from a large-scale survey and a clinical trial
    Jenkinson, C
    Layte, R
    Lawrence, K
    [J]. MEDICAL CARE, 1997, 35 (04) : 410 - 416
  • [23] Jonsson A, 1996, ACTA NEUROL SCAND, V93, P229
  • [24] COMPARATIVE MEASUREMENT SENSITIVITY OF SHORT AND LONGER HEALTH-STATUS INSTRUMENTS
    KATZ, JN
    LARSON, MG
    PHILLIPS, CB
    FOSSEL, AH
    LIANG, MH
    [J]. MEDICAL CARE, 1992, 30 (10) : 917 - 925
  • [25] Keith R A, 1987, Adv Clin Rehabil, V1, P6
  • [26] Changes in health after elective percutaneous coronary revascularization - A comparison of generic and specific measures
    Krumholz, HM
    McHorney, CA
    Clark, L
    Levesque, M
    Baim, DS
    Goldman, L
    [J]. MEDICAL CARE, 1996, 34 (08) : 754 - 759
  • [27] KURTZKE JF, 1983, NEUROLOGY, V33, P1444, DOI 10.1212/WNL.33.11.1444
  • [28] Quality of life in multiple sclerosis: The disability and impact profile (DIP)
    Lankhorst, GJ
    Jelles, F
    Smits, RCF
    Polman, CH
    Kuik, DJ
    Pfennings, LEMA
    Cohen, L
    vanderPloeg, HM
    Ketelaer, P
    Vleugels, L
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY, 1996, 243 (06) : 469 - 474
  • [29] LAROCCA NG, 1996, ADV CLIN TRIAL DESIG, P145
  • [30] Quality of life in multiple sclerosis in France, Germany, and the United Kingdom
    Murphy, N
    Confavreux, C
    Haas, J
    König, N
    Roullet, E
    Sailer, M
    Swash, M
    Young, C
    Mérot, JL
    Zimmermann, C
    Owen, L
    Watling, D
    Sharief, M
    Brohet, S
    Kanoui, V
    Regling, S
    Braun, M
    Tewari, VK
    Bochsler, JA
    Auguin, C
    Kazek, MP
    Cook, J
    Tiffonet, F
    Yeardley, H
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY NEUROSURGERY AND PSYCHIATRY, 1998, 65 (04) : 460 - 466