Radiological surveillance of interval breast cancers in screening programmes

被引:62
作者
Houssami, N [1 ]
Irwig, L
Ciatto, S
机构
[1] Univ Sydney, Sch Publ Hlth, Screening & Test Evaluat Program, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
[2] Ctr Studio & Prevenz Oncol, I-50131 Florence, Italy
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S1470-2045(06)70617-9
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Interval breast cancers-those diagnosed after a negative mammographic screen and before the next scheduled screen-are an important indicator of the potential effectiveness of population screening for breast cancer. Although the incidence of interval cancers is usually monitored, radiological surveillance is not undertaken routinely in most screening programmes. Here, we describe radiological surveillance of interval breast cancers and discuss methodological difficulties in the radiological review process and in the categorisation of interval cancers as false-negative, true, or occult. Furthermore, we identify methods that affect whether an interval cancer is classified as a false-negative (missed) or a true interval cancer. For all radiological categories of interval cancers, we outline possible changes to screening programmes that might improve cancer detection. Standardised radiological surveillance of interval cancers might allow within-programme comparisons and has the potential to guide practice and improve quality.
引用
收藏
页码:259 / 265
页数:7
相关论文
共 55 条
[1]   Radiological review of interval cancers in an Australian mammographic screening programme [J].
Amos, AF ;
Kavanagh, AM ;
Cawson, J .
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCREENING, 2000, 7 (04) :184-189
[2]   THE EFFICACY OF DOUBLE READING MAMMOGRAMS IN BREAST SCREENING [J].
ANDERSON, EDC ;
MUIR, BB ;
WALSH, JS ;
KIRKPATRICK, AE .
CLINICAL RADIOLOGY, 1994, 49 (04) :248-251
[3]  
[Anonymous], IARC HDB CANC PREV B
[4]   NHS breast screening programme: Is the high incidence of interval cancers inevitable? [J].
Asbury, D ;
Boggis, CRM ;
Sheals, D ;
Threlfall, AG ;
Woodman, CBJ .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1996, 313 (7069) :1369-1370
[5]  
Blanks R G, 1997, J Med Screen, V4, P98
[6]   A comparison of cancer detection rates achieved by breast cancer screening programmes by number of readers, for one and two view mammography: results from the UK National Health Service breast screening programme [J].
Blanks, RG ;
Wallis, MG ;
Moss, SM .
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCREENING, 1998, 5 (04) :195-201
[7]   Efficiency of cancer detection during routine repeat (incident) mammographic screening: two versus one view mammography [J].
Blanks, RG ;
Given-Wilson, RM ;
Moss, SM .
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCREENING, 1998, 5 (03) :141-145
[8]   SURVIVAL IN INTERVAL BREAST-CANCER IN THE DOM SCREENING-PROGRAM [J].
BREKELMANS, CT ;
PEETERS, PH ;
DEURENBERG, JJ ;
COLLETTE, HJ .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1995, 31A (11) :1830-1835
[9]   Interval cancer peer review in East Anglia: Implications for monitoring doctors as well as the NHS breast screening programme [J].
Britton, PD ;
McCann, J ;
O'Driscoll, D ;
Hunnam, G ;
Warren, RML .
CLINICAL RADIOLOGY, 2001, 56 (01) :44-49
[10]   Factors contributing to mammography failure in women aged 40-49 years [J].
Buist, DSM ;
Porter, PL ;
Lehman, C ;
Taplin, SH ;
White, E .
JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2004, 96 (19) :1432-1440