Review of Goal Attainment Scaling as a Useful Outcome Measure in Psychogeriatric Patients with Cognitive Disorders

被引:43
作者
Bouwens, Sharon F. M. [2 ]
van Heugten, Caroline M. [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Verhey, Frans R. J. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Maastricht, Alzheimer Ctr Limburg, NL-6202 AZ Maastricht, Netherlands
[2] Maastricht Univ, Dept Psychiat & Neuropsychol, Sch Mental Hlth & Neurosci, Maastricht, Netherlands
[3] Ctr Excellence Rehabil Med, Utrecht, Netherlands
[4] Univ Utrecht, Rudolf Magnus Inst, Utrecht, Netherlands
关键词
Individualized approach; Clinimetrics; Feasibility; Ecological validity; Everyday functioning; Daily life activities;
D O I
10.1159/000178757
中图分类号
R592 [老年病学]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 100203 ;
摘要
Background: Since evidence-based interventions are the standard, there is an urgent need for more information concerning individual ways of measuring clinically relevant outcomes of interventions in cognitive disorders such as dementia. Goal Attainment Scaling (GAS) seems to offer a meaningful outcome measure. Aim: To examine the applicability of GAS in psychogeriatric patients with cognitive disorders. Methods: A systematic review was performed on the available literature on the clinimetric aspects and the feasibility of GAS when used as an outcome measure for psychogeriatric patients with cognitive disorders. Eight databases were screened. Two authors independently reviewed all the data. Ten studies were included. Results: Mixed results were found for responsiveness, content validity, inter-rater reliability and construct/convergent validity. The involvement of patient and/or caregiver in the goal-setting procedure is possible and multiple domains can be implemented. The possibility to set at least 3 realistic goals per patient in less than 30 min is unclear and the need for involvement of a blinded assessor is not well established. Conclusion: GAS proved to be useful on important aspects of an outcome measure for psychogeriatric patients with cognitive disorders. Since other relevant aspects showed mixed results and the number of studies investigating the use of GAS in psychogeriatric patients with cognitive disorders is small, the evidence is not strong enough yet to state that GAS is an applicable outcome measure in this population. Copyright (C) 2008 S. Karger AG, Basel
引用
收藏
页码:528 / 540
页数:13
相关论文
共 68 条
[11]  
Cohen J., 1988, POWERSTATISTICALSCIE, DOI 10.4324/9780203771587
[12]   Behavioural disturbances in dementia patients and quality of the marital relationship [J].
de Vugt, ME ;
Stevens, F ;
Aalten, P ;
Lousberg, R ;
Jaspers, N ;
Winkens, I ;
Jolles, J ;
Verhey, FRJ .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GERIATRIC PSYCHIATRY, 2003, 18 (02) :149-154
[13]  
Donnelly Catherine, 2002, Can J Occup Ther, V69, P84
[14]  
FARAONE SV, 2008, MEDSCAPE PSYCHIAT ME
[15]   Assessing clinically meaningful change following a programme for managing chronic pain [J].
Fisher, Keren .
CLINICAL REHABILITATION, 2008, 22 (03) :252-259
[16]   MINI-MENTAL STATE - PRACTICAL METHOD FOR GRADING COGNITIVE STATE OF PATIENTS FOR CLINICIAN [J].
FOLSTEIN, MF ;
FOLSTEIN, SE ;
MCHUGH, PR .
JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRIC RESEARCH, 1975, 12 (03) :189-198
[17]  
FOX RA, 1989, CAN MED ASSOC J, V141, P1045
[18]   Cholinesterase inhibitors in late-stage Alzheimer's disease [J].
Gauthier, S .
LANCET NEUROLOGY, 2006, 5 (06) :468-469
[19]   OARS METHODOLOGY - A DECADE OF EXPERIENCE IN GERIATRIC ASSESSMENT [J].
GEORGE, LK ;
FILLENBAUM, GG .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, 1985, 33 (09) :607-615
[20]   Goal attainment scaling as a measure of clinically important change in nursing-home patients [J].
Gordon, JE ;
Powell, C ;
Rockwood, K .
AGE AND AGEING, 1999, 28 (03) :275-281