Naturalized epistemology and the critique of evidence theory

被引：20

作者：

Nance, DA ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] IIT, Chicago Kent Coll Law, Chicago, IL 60616 USA

来源：

关键词：

D O I：

10.2307/1073902

中图分类号：

D9 [法律]; DF [法律];

学科分类号：

0301 ;

摘要：

[No abstract available]

引用

页码：1551 / 1618

页数：68

共 96 条

[81]

RAKOS RF, 1992, MINN LAW REV, V76, P655

[82]

ROBERTSON B, 1993, OXFORD J LEGAL STUD, V13, P457, DOI DOI 10.1093/ojls/13.4.457

[83]

ROBERTSON B, 1995, INTERPRETING EVIDENC, P33

[84]

ROBERTSON B, 1993, OXFORD J LEGAL STUD, V13, P471

[85] Juror reactions to DNA evidence: Errors and expectancies [J].

Schklar, J ;

Diamond, SS .

[86]

Schum D., 1994, EVIDENTIAL FDN PROBA

[87]

SEIGEL ML, 1992, BOSTON U LAW REV, V72, P893

[88]

SKYRMS B, 1975, CHOICE CHANCE INTRO, P168

[89] Jurors' use of probabilistic evidence [J].

Smith, BC ;

Penrod, SD ;

Otto, AL ;

Park, RC .

[90]

Stein A, 2001, TEX LAW REV, V79, P1199