Current clinical selection strategies for identification of hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer families are inadequate: a meta-analysis

被引:51
作者
Kievit, W
de Bruin, JHFM
Adang, EMM
Ligtenberg, MJL
Nagengast, FM
van Krieken, JHJM
Hoogerbrugge, N
机构
[1] Univ Med Ctr Nijmegen, Dept Human Genet, NL-6500 HB Nijmegen, Netherlands
[2] Univ Med Ctr Nijmegen, Dept Med Technol Assessment, Nijmegen, Netherlands
[3] Univ Med Ctr Nijmegen, Dept Pathol, Nijmegen, Netherlands
[4] Univ Med Ctr Nijmegen, Dept Gastroenterol, Nijmegen, Netherlands
[5] Univ Med Ctr Nijmegen, Dept Med Oncol, Nijmegen, Netherlands
关键词
Amsterdam criteria; Amsterdam criteria modified; Bethesda Guidelines; HNPCC; meta-analysis; sensitivity; specificity;
D O I
10.1111/j.1399-0004.2004.00220.x
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
Present guidelines to identify hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) families are criticized for limitations in accuracy. The Amsterdam criteria I and II (AC I and AC II) are used to predict a germline mutation in one of the mismatch repair genes. In families not fulfilling the AC I and AC II criteria, individual indications to test cancer specimens for microsatellite instability (MSI) are guided by the Bethesda Guidelines (BG). Germline mutation testing is then performed in patients who conform to the BG and show MSI. We investigated the sensitivity and specificity of AC I, AC II, and BG. A meta-analysis of studies on the value of the AC I and AC II criteria for predicting germline mutation, as well as a meta-analysis of BG for the detection of MSI was performed. For the AC I, sensitivity varied from 54 to 91% and specificity varied from 62 to 84%. For the AC II, the pooled sensitivity was 78% and specificity ranged between 46 and 68%. Post-test probabilities of a positive test result were 0.61 and 0.46 for the AC I and AC II, respectively. Post-test probabilities of a negative test result were 0.17 and 0.21 for the AC I and AC II, respectively. For the BG, the pooled sensitivity was 89% and pooled specificity was 53%. Post-test probability of a positive test result was 41%, and post-test probability of a negative test result was 9%. The sensitivity and specificity of the Amsterdam criteria for predicting a germline mutation that causes HNPCC is not sufficient. The BG are useful for the detection of MSI in a group of patients suspected of having familial colorectal cancer (CRC), but sensitivity is very low in the total group of newly diagnosed CRC patients. Therefore, a new strategy is needed for the identification of HNPCC.
引用
收藏
页码:308 / 316
页数:9
相关论文
共 43 条
[21]  
Lynch HT, 1999, J MED GENET, V36, P801
[22]   Microsatellite instability and mutation analysis of hMSH2 and hMLH1 in patients with sporadic, familial and hereditary colorectal cancer [J].
Moslein, G ;
Tester, DJ ;
Lindor, NM ;
Honchel, R ;
Cunningham, JM ;
French, AJ ;
Halling, KC ;
Schwab, M ;
Goretzki, P ;
Thibodeau, SN .
HUMAN MOLECULAR GENETICS, 1996, 5 (09) :1245-1252
[23]   DNA mismatch repair gene mutations in 55 kindreds with verified or putative hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer [J].
NystromLahti, M ;
Wu, Y ;
Moisio, AL ;
Hofstra, RMW ;
Osinga, J ;
MEcklin, JP ;
Jarvinen, HJ ;
Leisti, J ;
Buys, CHCM ;
delaChapelle, A ;
Peltomaki, P .
HUMAN MOLECULAR GENETICS, 1996, 5 (06) :763-769
[24]   Suspected HNPCC and Amsterdam criteria II: evaluation of mutation detection rate, an international collaborative study [J].
Park, JG ;
Vasen, HFA ;
Park, YJ ;
Park, KJ ;
Peltomaki, P ;
de Leon, MP ;
Rodriguez-Bigas, MA ;
Lubinski, J ;
Beck, NE ;
Bisgaard, ML ;
Miyaki, M ;
Wijnen, JT ;
Baba, S ;
Lindblom, A ;
Madlensky, L ;
Lynch, HT .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2002, 17 (02) :109-114
[25]   Bethesda guidelines:: Relation to microsatellite instability and MLH1 promoter methylation in patients with colorectal cancer [J].
Raedle, J ;
Trojan, J ;
Brieger, A ;
Weber, N ;
Schäfer, D ;
Plotz, G ;
Staib-Sebler, E ;
Kriener, S ;
Lorenz, M ;
Zeuzem, S .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2001, 135 (08) :566-576
[26]   Comparison of selection strategies for genetic testing of patients with hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal carcinoma - Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness [J].
Reyes, CM ;
Allen, BA ;
Terdiman, JP ;
Wilson, LS .
CANCER, 2002, 95 (09) :1848-1856
[27]   A National Cancer Institute workshop on hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer syndrome: Meeting highlights and Bethesda guidelines [J].
RodriguezBigas, MA ;
Boland, CR ;
Hamilton, SR ;
Henson, DE ;
Jass, JR ;
Khan, PM ;
Lynch, H ;
Perucho, M ;
Smyrk, T ;
Sobin, L ;
Srivastava, S .
JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 1997, 89 (23) :1758-1762
[28]   Correlation of mismatch repair genes immunohistochemistry and microsatellite instability status in HNPCC-associated tumours [J].
Ruszkiewicz, A ;
Bennett, G ;
Moore, J ;
Manavis, J ;
Rudzki, B ;
Shen, L ;
Suthers, G .
PATHOLOGY, 2002, 34 (06) :541-547
[29]   Population-based molecular detection of hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer [J].
Salovaara, R ;
Loukola, A ;
Kristo, P ;
Kääriäinen, H ;
Ahtola, H ;
Eskelinen, M ;
Härkönen, N ;
Julkunen, R ;
Kangas, E ;
Ojala, S ;
Tulikoura, J ;
Valkamo, E ;
Järvinen, H ;
Mecklin, JP ;
Aaltonen, LA ;
de la Chapelle, A .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2000, 18 (11) :2193-2200
[30]   Hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer in 95 families: Differences and similarities between mutation-positive and mutation-negative kindreds [J].
Scott, RJ ;
McPhillips, M ;
Meldrum, CJ ;
Fitzgerald, PE ;
Adams, K ;
Spigelman, AD ;
du Sart, D ;
Tucker, K ;
Kirk, J .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS, 2001, 68 (01) :118-127