Solvent dramatically affects protein structure refinement

被引:86
作者
Chopra, Gaurav [1 ]
Summa, Christopher M. [2 ]
Levitt, Michael [1 ]
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Dept Biol Struct, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[2] Univ New Orleans, Dept Comp Sci, New Orleans, LA 70148 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会; 美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
energy minimization; implicit solvent; knowledge-based; molecular dynamics; explicit solvent;
D O I
10.1073/pnas.0810818105
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
One of the most challenging problems in protein structure prediction is improvement of homology models (structures within 1-3 angstrom C-alpha rmsd of the native structure), also known as the protein structure refinement problem. It has been shown that improvement could be achieved using in vacuo energy minimization with molecular mechanics and statistically derived continuously differentiable hybrid knowledge-based (KB) potential functions. Globular proteins, however, fold and function in aqueous solution in vivo and in vitro. In this work, we study the role of solvent in protein structure refinement. Molecular dynamics in explicit solvent and energy minimization in both explicit and implicit solvent were performed on a set of 75 native proteins to test the various energy potentials. A more stringent test for refinement was performed on 729 near-native decoys for each native protein. We use a powerfully convergent energy minimization method to show that implicit solvent (GBSA) provides greater improvement for some proteins than the KB potential: 24 of 75 proteins showing an average improvement of > 20% in C-alpha rmsd from the native structure with GBSA, compared to just 7 proteins with KB. Molecular dynamics in explicit solvent moved the structures further away from their native conformation than the initial, unrefined decoys. Implicit solvent gives rise to a deep, smooth potential energy attractor basin that pulls toward the native structure.
引用
收藏
页码:20239 / 20244
页数:6
相关论文
共 48 条
[1]   Large-scale assessment of the utility of low-resolution protein structures for biochemical function assignment [J].
Arakaki, AK ;
Zhang, Y ;
Skolnick, J .
BIOINFORMATICS, 2004, 20 (07) :1087-1096
[2]   Protein structure prediction and structural genomics [J].
Baker, D ;
Sali, A .
SCIENCE, 2001, 294 (5540) :93-96
[3]  
Berendsen H. J. C., 1981, INTERMOLECULAR FORCE, P331, DOI [DOI 10.1007/978-94-015-7658, DOI 10.1007/978-94-015-7658-1_21]
[4]   GROMACS - A MESSAGE-PASSING PARALLEL MOLECULAR-DYNAMICS IMPLEMENTATION [J].
BERENDSEN, HJC ;
VANDERSPOEL, D ;
VANDRUNEN, R .
COMPUTER PHYSICS COMMUNICATIONS, 1995, 91 (1-3) :43-56
[5]   X-RAY STUDIES OF WATER IN CRYSTALS OF LYSOZYME [J].
BLAKE, CCF ;
PULFORD, WCA ;
ARTYMIUK, PJ .
JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, 1983, 167 (03) :693-723
[6]   AN X-RAY STUDY OF HORSE METHAEMOGLOBIN .1. [J].
BOYESWATSON, J ;
DAVIDSON, E ;
PERUTZ, MF .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY OF LONDON SERIES A-MATHEMATICAL AND PHYSICAL SCIENCES, 1947, 191 (1024) :83-&
[7]   The impact of structural genomics: Expectations and outcomes [J].
Chandonia, JM ;
Brenner, SE .
SCIENCE, 2006, 311 (5759) :347-351
[8]   Can molecular dynamics simulations provide high-resolution refinement of protein structure? [J].
Chen, Jianhan ;
Brooks, Charles L., III .
PROTEINS-STRUCTURE FUNCTION AND BIOINFORMATICS, 2007, 67 (04) :922-930
[9]   Implicit solvation models: Equilibria, structure, spectra, and dynamics [J].
Cramer, CJ ;
Truhlar, DG .
CHEMICAL REVIEWS, 1999, 99 (08) :2161-2200
[10]   The limit of accuracy of protein modeling: Influence of crystal packing on protein structure [J].
Eyal, E ;
Gerzon, S ;
Potapov, V ;
Edelman, M ;
Sobolev, V .
JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, 2005, 351 (02) :431-442