Effectiveness of Back School Versus McKenzie Exercises in Patients With Chronic Nonspecific Low Back Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial

被引:89
作者
Garcia, Alessandra Narciso [1 ]
Menezes Costa, Luciola da Cunha [1 ]
da Silva, Tatiane Mota [1 ]
Barreto Gondo, Francine Lopes [2 ]
Cyrillo, Fabio Navarro [2 ]
Costa, Renata Alqualo [2 ]
Pena Costa, Leonardo Oliveira [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cidade Sao Paulo, Masters & Doctoral Programs Phys Therapy, BR-03071000 Sao Paulo, Brazil
[2] Univ Cidade Sao Paulo, Phys Therapy Dept, BR-03071000 Sao Paulo, Brazil
[3] George Inst Global Hlth, Musculoskeletal Div, Sydney, NSW, Australia
来源
PHYSICAL THERAPY | 2013年 / 93卷 / 06期
基金
巴西圣保罗研究基金会;
关键词
QUALITY-OF-LIFE; EXTENSION EXERCISES; MANUAL THERAPY; ROLAND-MORRIS; PROGRAM; MANIPULATION; DISABILITY; EDUCATION; CENTRALIZATION; VALIDATION;
D O I
10.2522/ptj.20120414
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
100224 [整形外科学];
摘要
Background. Back School and McKenzie methods are popular active treatment approaches that include both exercises and information for patients with chronic nonspecific low back pain. Objective. The purpose of this study was to compare the effectiveness of Back School and McKenzie methods in patients with chronic nonspecific low back pain. Design. The study was a prospectively registered, 2-arm randomized controlled trial with a blinded assessor. Setting. The study was conducted in the outpatient physical therapy clinic in Sao Paulo, Brazil. Patients. The study participants were 148 patients with chronic nonspecific low back pain. Interventions. The 4-week treatment program (one session/week) was based on the Back School (delivered to the group) or McKenzie (delivered individually) principles. The participants also were instructed to perform a daily set of home exercises. Measurements. Clinical outcomes were assessed at follow-up appointments at 1, 3, and 6 months after randomization. Primary outcome measures, were pain intensity (measured by the 0-10 pain numerical rating scale) and disability (measured by the 24-item Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire) 1 month after randomization. Secondary outcome measures were pain intensity and disability at 3 and 6 months after randomization, quality of life (measured by the World Health Organization Quality of Life-BREF instrument) at 1, 3, and 6 months after randomization, and trunk flexion range of motion measured by an inclinometer at 1 month after randomization. The data were collected by a blinded assessor. Results. Participants allocated to the McKenzie group had greater improvements in disability at 1 month (mean effect=2.37 points, 95% confidence interval=0.76 to 3.99) but not for pain (mean effect=0.66 points, 95% confidence interval=0.29' to 1.62). No between-group differences were observed for all secondary outcome measures. Limitations. It was not possible to monitor the home exercise program. Therapists and participants were not blinded. Conclusions. The McKenzie method (a more resource-intensive intervention) was slightly more effective than the Back School method for disability, but not for pain intensity immediately after treatment in participants with chronic low back pain.
引用
收藏
页码:729 / 747
页数:19
相关论文
共 74 条
[41]
McKenzie R., 2003, LUMBAR SPINE MECH DI, V1
[42]
The prognosis of acute and persistent low-back pain: a meta-analysis [J].
Menezes Costa, Luciola da C. ;
Maher, Christopher G. ;
Hancock, Mark J. ;
McAuley, James H. ;
Herbert, Robert D. ;
Costa, Leonardo O. P. .
CANADIAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL, 2012, 184 (11) :E613-E624
[43]
Merrifield Alistair, 2012, N S W Public Health Bull, V23, P142, DOI 10.1071/NB11017
[44]
A Comparison of the McKenzie Approach to a Specific Spine Stabilization Program for Chronic Low Back Pain [J].
Miller, Eric R. ;
Schenk, Ronald J. ;
Karnes, James L. ;
Rousselle, John G. .
JOURNAL OF MANUAL & MANIPULATIVE THERAPY, 2005, 13 (02) :103-112
[45]
A CONTROLLED, PROSPECTIVE-STUDY TO EVALUATE THE EFFECTIVENESS OF A BACK SCHOOL IN THE RELIEF OF CHRONIC LOW-BACK-PAIN [J].
MOFFETT, JAK ;
CHASE, SM ;
PORTEK, I ;
ENNIS, JR .
SPINE, 1986, 11 (02) :120-122
[46]
Morone G, 2011, EUR J PHYS REHAB MED, V47, P533
[47]
Translation, adaptation and validation of the Roland-Morris questionnaire - Brazil Roland-Morris [J].
Nusbaum, L ;
Natour, J ;
Ferraz, MB ;
Goldenberg, J .
BRAZILIAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL AND BIOLOGICAL RESEARCH, 2001, 34 (02) :203-210
[48]
NWUGA G, 1985, THEORY PRACT, V1, P99
[49]
Interpreting change scores for pain and functional status in low back pain - Towards international consensus regarding minimal important change [J].
Ostelo, Raymond W. J. G. ;
Deyo, Rick A. ;
Stratford, P. ;
Waddell, Gordon ;
Croft, Peter ;
Von Korff, Michael ;
Bouter, Lex M. ;
de Vet, Henrica C. .
SPINE, 2008, 33 (01) :90-94
[50]
ORTHOPAEDIC MANUAL THERAPY, MCKENZIE METHOD OR ADVICE ONLY FOR LOW BACK PAIN IN WORKING ADULTS: A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL WITH ONE YEAR FOLLOW-UP [J].
Paatelma, Markku ;
Kilpikoski, Sinikka ;
Simonen, Riitta ;
Heinonen, Ari ;
Alen, Markku ;
Videman, Tapio .
JOURNAL OF REHABILITATION MEDICINE, 2008, 40 (10) :858-863