Access holidays and the timing of infrastructure investment

被引:29
作者
Gans, JS [1 ]
King, SP [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Melbourne, Melbourne Business Sch, Carlton, Vic 3053, Australia
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.1475-4932.2004.00127.x
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
For risky infrastructure investment, 'regulatory truncation' can diminish investment incentives. We model the truncation problem, showing the link to regulatory commitment, and derive optimal state contingent access prices. If regulators cannot commit ex ante to specific ex post access prices then a regulatory commitment to a fixed period free of access - an access holiday - can improve investment incentives. We establish conditions under which an access holiday may improve investment timing and show how an optimal holiday depends on the underlying profit flows from the investment. In particular, we show that an optimal holiday may leave investors with positive expected economic profits.
引用
收藏
页码:89 / 100
页数:12
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], HDB IND ORG
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1998, DEREGULATORY TAKINGS
[3]   Essential facility financing and market structure [J].
Caillaud, B ;
Tirole, J .
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ECONOMICS, 2004, 88 (3-4) :667-694
[4]  
Gans J., 2003, Agenda, V10, P163
[5]   Access regulation and the timing of infrastructure investment [J].
Gans, JS ;
Williams, PL .
ECONOMIC RECORD, 1999, 75 (229) :127-137
[6]   Regulating private infrastructure investment: Optimal pricing for access to essential facilities [J].
Gans, JS .
JOURNAL OF REGULATORY ECONOMICS, 2001, 20 (02) :167-189
[7]  
Gans JS, 2000, AUST ECON REV, V33, P145, DOI DOI 10.1111/1467-8462.00144
[8]  
KATZ ML, 1987, AM ECON REV, V77, P402
[9]  
KING SP, 1996, UNLOCKING INFRASTRUC
[10]  
Laffont JJ, 1999, Competition in telecommunications