Physical parameters influencing optimization of ultrasound-mediated DNA transfection

被引:131
作者
Zarnitsyn, VG [1 ]
Prausnitz, MR [1 ]
机构
[1] Georgia Inst Technol, Sch Chem & Biomol Engn, Atlanta, GA 30332 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会; 美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
ultrasound bioeffects; gene transfection; acoustic cavitation; cell viability; drug delivery;
D O I
10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2004.01.008
中图分类号
O42 [声学];
学科分类号
070206 ; 082403 ;
摘要
Ultrasound (US) has been shown to transiently disrupt cell membranes and, thereby, facilitate the loading of drugs and genes into viable cells. To address optimization of gene therapy applications, the aim of this work was to systematically determine the influence of physical parameters on transfection and viability of DU145 prostate cancer cells by two different DNA plasmids (pEGFP-N1 and pGL3). By sonicating cells in vitro in the presence of naked DNA, we found that transfection efficiency was increased by: 1. optimizing acoustic energy at 10 to 30 J/cm(2) (for our apparatus, at pressures above the cavitation threshold); 2. using 500-kHz US in the presence of Optison(R) to nucleate cavition, rather than 24-kHz US without Optison(R); 3. increasing cell concentration from 10(6) to 10(7) cells/mL; and 4. changing temperature during sonication from 21 to 37degreesC. The best conditions in this study increased transfection by almost 100-fold in the absence of significant DNA damage. Additional measurements indicated that less than one fourth of cells with DNA plasmid uptake into the cytosol showed DNA expression, which suggests that further optimizing transfection by US may require facilitating intracellular DNA trafficking. (E-mail: mark. prausnitz @ chbe.gatech.edu) (C) 2004 World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine Biology.
引用
收藏
页码:527 / 538
页数:12
相关论文
共 47 条
[1]   Sonic effervescence: A tutorial on acoustic cavitation [J].
Apfel, RE .
JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 1997, 101 (03) :1227-1237
[2]  
Ashush H, 2000, CANCER RES, V60, P1014
[3]   Transfection of a reporter plasmid into cultured cells by sonoporation in vitro [J].
Bao, SP ;
Thrall, BD ;
Miller, DL .
ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 1997, 23 (06) :953-959
[4]   An overview of current delivery systems in cancer gene therapy [J].
El-Aneed, A .
JOURNAL OF CONTROLLED RELEASE, 2004, 94 (01) :1-14
[5]   Fetal gene transfer by intrauterine injection with microbubble-enhanced ultrasound [J].
Endoh, M ;
Koibuchi, N ;
Sato, M ;
Morishita, R ;
Kanzaki, T ;
Murata, Y ;
Kaneda, Y .
MOLECULAR THERAPY, 2002, 5 (05) :501-508
[6]   Critical assessment of the nuclear import of plasmid during cationic lipid-mediated gene transfer [J].
Escriou, V ;
Carrière, M ;
Bussone, F ;
Wils, P ;
Scherman, D .
JOURNAL OF GENE MEDICINE, 2001, 3 (02) :179-187
[7]   NLS bioconjugates for targeting therapeutic genes to the nucleus [J].
Escriou, V ;
Carrière, M ;
Scherman, D ;
Wils, P .
ADVANCED DRUG DELIVERY REVIEWS, 2003, 55 (02) :295-306
[8]   TRANSFECTION OF MAMMALIAN-CELLS WITH PLASMID DNA BY SCRAPE LOADING AND SONICATION LOADING [J].
FECHHEIMER, M ;
BOYLAN, JF ;
PARKER, S ;
SISKEN, JE ;
PATEL, GL ;
ZIMMER, SG .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 1987, 84 (23) :8463-8467
[9]  
Fowlkes JB., 2000, J ULTRAS MED, V19, P143
[10]   FACTORS INFLUENCING TRANSIENT EXPRESSION IN CYTOTOXIC T-CELLS FOLLOWING DEAE DEXTRAN-MEDIATED GENE-TRANSFER [J].
FREGEAU, CJ ;
BLEACKLEY, RC .
SOMATIC CELL AND MOLECULAR GENETICS, 1991, 17 (03) :239-257