A phase I trial of tailored radiation therapy with concomitant cetuximab and cisplatin in the treatment of patients with cervical cancer: A gynecologic oncology group study

被引:35
作者
Moore, Kathleen N. [1 ]
Sill, Michael W. [2 ,3 ]
Miller, David S. [4 ]
McCourt, Carolyn [5 ]
De Geest, Koen [6 ]
Rose, Peter G. [7 ]
Cardenes, Higinia R. [8 ]
Mannel, Robert S. [1 ]
Farley, John H. [9 ]
Schilder, Russell J. [10 ]
Fracasso, Paula M. [11 ,12 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oklahoma, HSC, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Div Gynecol Oncol, Oklahoma City, OK 73104 USA
[2] Roswell Pk Canc Inst, Stat & Data Ctr, Gynecol Oncol Grp, Buffalo, NY 14263 USA
[3] SUNY Buffalo, Dept Biostat, Buffalo, NY 14214 USA
[4] Univ Texas SW Med Ctr Dallas, Div Gynecol Oncol, Dallas, TX 75390 USA
[5] Brown Univ, Women & Infants Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Providence, RI 02905 USA
[6] Univ Iowa Hosp & Clin, Div Gynecol Oncol, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Iowa City, IA 52242 USA
[7] Cleveland Clin Fdn, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Cleveland, OH 44195 USA
[8] Indiana Univ Sch Med, Dept Radiat Oncol, Indianapolis, IN 46202 USA
[9] Uniformed Serv Univ Hlth Sci, Dept Obstet Ea Gynecol, Bethesda, MD 20832 USA
[10] Fox Chase Canc Ctr, Dept Med Oncol, Philadelphia, PA 19111 USA
[11] Univ Virginia, Dept Med, Charlottesville, VA 22908 USA
[12] Univ Virginia, UVA Canc Ctr, Charlottesville, VA 22908 USA
关键词
Cervical cancer; Pelvic radiation; Cetuximab; SQUAMOUS-CELL-CARCINOMA; CLINICAL-TRIALS; PLUS CETUXIMAB; OPEN-LABEL; STAGE IIB; CHEMOTHERAPY; CONCURRENT; RADIOTHERAPY; COMBINATION; HEAD;
D O I
10.1016/j.ygyno.2012.08.030
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 [肿瘤学];
摘要
Background. Epithelial growth factor receptor over-expression correlates with poor outcomes in cervical cancer. This study assessed the safety of chemoradiation with cetuximab in the treatment of women with newly diagnosed locally advanced cervical cancer. Methods. Patients received weekly cisplatin 30 and 40 mg/m(2) [dose level (DL) 1 and 2] and cetuximab 400 mg/m(2) loading dose and then 250 mg/m(2) for a total of six weeks with radiotherapy (RT). Patients with nodal metastases received extended field radiation therapy (EFRT). At the maximum tolerated dose, feasibility was evaluated in a 20 patient two-stage, sequential design. Results. In patients receiving pelvic RT, seven were treated at DL 1 with one dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) (febrile neutropenia with grade 3 diarrhea) and three at DL 2 with two DLTs (grade 3 rash and delay in RT >8 weeks). The feasibility phase was opened at DL1. Of the 21 patients treated there was one DLT (grade 4 CVA). Median RT duration was 50 days (range, 42-70). In patients receiving EFRT, nine were treated at DL 1 with 1 DLT (grade 3 mucositis) and 24 in the feasibility phase with eight DLTs [delay in RT >8 weeks due to toxicity (2) and one each with grade 3 or 4 small bowel obstruction, embolism, mucositis, mucositis with hypokalemia, pain with headache, and platelets with mucositis and headache]. Median EFRT duration was 56 days (range, 36-74). Conclusions. For patients receiving pelvic RT, cisplatin and cetuximab were feasible. For patients receiving EFRT, combination of cisplatin and cetuximab was not feasible. (C) 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:456 / 461
页数:6
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]
American Cancer Society, 2012, Cancer Facts and Figures 2012
[2]
Radiotherapy plus cetuximab for squamous-cell carcinoma of the head and neck [J].
Bonner, JA ;
Harari, PM ;
Giralt, J ;
Azarnia, N ;
Shin, DM ;
Cohen, RB ;
Jones, CU ;
Sur, R ;
Raben, D ;
Jassem, J ;
Ove, R ;
Kies, MS ;
Baselga, J ;
Youssoufian, H ;
Amellal, N ;
Rowinsky, EK ;
Ang, KK .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2006, 354 (06) :567-578
[3]
P63 and EGFR as prognostic predictors in stage IIB radiation-treated cervical squamous cell carcinoma [J].
Cho, NH ;
Kim, YB ;
Park, TK ;
Kim, GE ;
Park, K ;
Song, KJ .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2003, 91 (02) :346-353
[4]
Radiation therapy with concomitant paclitaxel and cisplatin chemotherapy in cervical carcinoma limited to the pelvis: A phase I/II study of the Gynecologic Oncology Group [J].
DiSilvestro, Paul A. ;
Walker, Joan L. ;
Morrison, Astrid ;
Rose, Peter G. ;
Homesley, Howard ;
Warshal, David .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2006, 103 (03) :1038-1042
[5]
Phase III, Open-Label, Randomized Study Comparing Concurrent Gemcitabine Plus Cisplatin and Radiation Followed by Adjuvant Gemcitabine and Cisplatin Versus Concurrent Cisplatin and Radiation in Patients With Stage IIB to IVA Carcinoma of the Cervix [J].
Duenas-Gonzalez, Alfonso ;
Zarba, Juan J. ;
Patel, Firuza ;
Alcedo, Juan C. ;
Beslija, Semir ;
Casanova, Luis ;
Pattaranutaporn, Pittayapoom ;
Hameed, Shahid ;
Blair, Julie M. ;
Barraclough, Helen ;
Orlando, Mauro .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2011, 29 (13) :1678-1685
[6]
Phase II study of cisplatin plus cetuximab in advanced, recurrent, and previously treated cancers of the cervix and evaluation of epidermal growth factor receptor immunohistochemical expression: A Gynecologic Oncology Group study [J].
Farley, John ;
Sill, Michael W. ;
Birrer, Michael ;
Walker, Joan ;
Schilder, Russell J. ;
Thigpen, J. Tate ;
Coleman, Robert L. ;
Miller, Brigitte E. ;
Rose, Peter G. ;
Lankes, Heather A. .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2011, 121 (02) :303-308
[7]
ONE-SAMPLE MULTIPLE TESTING PROCEDURE FOR PHASE-II CLINICAL-TRIALS [J].
FLEMING, TR .
BIOMETRICS, 1982, 38 (01) :143-151
[8]
Fracasso PM, 2007, P AM ASS CANC RES
[9]
A phase II study of acute toxicity for celebrex™ (celecoxib) and chemoradiation in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer:: Primary endpoint analysis of RTOG 0128 [J].
Gaffney, David K. ;
Winter, Kathryn ;
Dicker, Adam P. ;
Miller, Brigitte ;
Eifel, Patricia J. ;
Ryu, Janice ;
Avizonis, Vilija ;
Fromm, Mitch ;
Greven, Kathryn .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2007, 67 (01) :104-109
[10]
A phase II trial to evaluate gefitinib as second- or third-line treatment in patients with recurring locoregionally advanced or metastatic cervical cancer [J].
Goncalves, A. ;
Fabbro, M. ;
Lhomme, C. ;
Gladieff, L. ;
Extra, J. -M. ;
Floquet, A. ;
Chaigneau, L. ;
Carrasco, A. Tisseron ;
Viens, P. .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2008, 108 (01) :42-46