The climate sensitivity and its components diagnosed from Earth Radiation Budget data

被引:122
作者
Forster, PMD
Gregory, JM
机构
[1] Univ Reading, Dept Meteorol, Ctr Global Atmospher Modelling, Reading, Berks, England
[2] Hadley Ctr, Met Off, Exeter, Devon, England
关键词
D O I
10.1175/JCLI3611.1
中图分类号
P4 [大气科学(气象学)];
学科分类号
0706 ; 070601 ;
摘要
One of the major uncertainties in the ability to predict future climate change, and hence its impacts, is the lack of knowledge of the earth's climate sensitivity. Here, data are combined from the 1985-96 Earth Radiation Budget Experiment (ERBE) with surface temperature change information and estimates of radiative forcing to diagnose the climate sensitivity. Importantly, the estimate is completely independent of climate model results. A climate feedback parameter of 2.3 +/- 1.4 W m(-2) K-1 is found. This corresponds to a 1.0-4.1-K range for the equilibrium warming due to a doubling of carbon dioxide (assuming Gaussian errors in observable parameters, which is approximately equivalent to a uniform "prior" in feedback parameter). The uncertainty range is due to a combination of the short time period for the analysis as well as uncertainties in the surface temperature time series and radiative forcing time series, mostly the former. Radiative forcings may not all be fully accounted for; however, all argument is presented that the estimate of climate sensitivity is still likely to be representative of longer-term climate change. The methodology can be used to 1) retrieve shortwave and longwave components of climate feedback and 2) suggest clear-sky and cloud feedback terms. There is preliminary evidence of a neutral or even negative longwave feedback in the observations, suggesting that current climate models may not be representing some processes correctly if they give a net positive longwave feedback.
引用
收藏
页码:39 / 52
页数:14
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]   Cloud feedback in atmospheric general circulation models: An update [J].
Cess, RD ;
Zhang, MH ;
Ingram, WJ ;
Potter, GL ;
Alskseev, V ;
Barker, HW ;
Cohen-Solal, E ;
Colman, RA ;
Dazlich, DA ;
Del Genio, AD ;
Dix, MR ;
Dymnikov, V ;
Esch, M ;
Fowler, LD ;
Fraser, JR ;
Galin, V ;
Gates, WL ;
Hack, JJ ;
Kiehl, JT ;
Le Treut, H ;
Lo, KKW ;
McAvaney, BJ ;
Meleshko, VP ;
Morcrette, JJ ;
Randall, DA ;
Roeckner, E ;
Royer, JF ;
Schlesinger, ME ;
Sporyshev, PV ;
Timbal, B ;
Volodin, EM ;
Taylor, KE ;
Wang, W ;
Wetherald, RT .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 1996, 101 (D8) :12791-12794
[2]   A comparison of climate feedbacks in general circulation models [J].
Colman, R .
CLIMATE DYNAMICS, 2003, 20 (7-8) :865-873
[3]   Non-linear climate feedback analysis in an atmospheric general circulation model [J].
Colman, RA ;
Power, SB ;
McAvaney, BJ .
CLIMATE DYNAMICS, 1997, 13 (10) :717-731
[4]   LINEAR-REGRESSION IN ASTRONOMY .2. [J].
FEIGELSON, ED ;
BABU, GJ .
ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 1992, 397 (01) :55-67
[5]   Quantifying uncertainties in climate system properties with the use of recent climate observations [J].
Forest, CE ;
Stone, PH ;
Sokolov, AP ;
Allen, MR ;
Webster, MD .
SCIENCE, 2002, 295 (5552) :113-117
[6]   Quantifying the water vapour feedback associated with post-Pinatubo global cooling [J].
Forster, PMD ;
Collins, M .
CLIMATE DYNAMICS, 2004, 23 (02) :207-214
[7]  
Gregory JM, 2002, J CLIMATE, V15, P3117, DOI 10.1175/1520-0442(2002)015&lt
[8]  
3117:AOBEOT&gt
[9]  
2.0.CO
[10]  
2