Effects of increased in vivo excursion on digital range of motion and tendon strength following flexor tendon repair

被引:56
作者
Silva, MJ
Brodt, MD
Boyer, MI
Morris, TS
Dinopoulos, H
Amiel, D
Gelberman, RH
机构
[1] Washington Univ, Sch Med, Barnes Jewish Hosp, Dept Orthopaed Surg, St Louis, MO USA
[2] Univ Calif San Diego, Dept Orthoped, La Jolla, CA 92093 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1002/jor.1100170524
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Postoperative rehabilitation is an important factor in determining functional outcome following intrasynovial flexor tendon repair. We hypothesized that a rt habilitation protocol that produced increased in vivo excursion would lead to increased digital range of motion and tendon strength and decreased adhesion formation in a canine model. Ninety-six flexor digitorum profundus tendons from 48 dogs were cut transversely and repaired by a multistrand suture technique. Postoperative rehabilitation was performed daily with a low excursion-low force (1.7-mm average excursion; < 10 N force) or a high excursion-low force (3.6 mm excursion, < 10 N force) protocol. After death of the dogs at 10, 21, or 42 days, specimens were evaluated for digital range of motion, tensile mechanical properties, elongation of the repair site, and adhesion formation. Our data indicate that the range of motion of digits whose tendons were at low or high excursion was similar to that of controls. Increased in vivo tendon excursion due to synergistic wrist motion did not significantly affect ex vivo flexion of the distal and proximal interphalangeal joints or tendon displacement (p > 0.05). Similarly, tensile properties (ultimate load. repair site rigidity, and repair site strain at 20 N and at failure) and length of the Sap at the repair site were not significantly affected by increased excursion (p > 0.05). Severity of adhesion formation was reduced slightly by increased excursion (p = 0.04). Our findings indicate that 1.7 mm of tendon excursion is sufficient to prevent adhesion formation following sharp transection of the canine flexor tendon and that additional excursion provides little added benefit.
引用
收藏
页码:777 / 783
页数:7
相关论文
共 33 条
[11]
GELBERMAN RH, 1991, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, V264, P189
[12]
A COMPUTER-BASED BIOMECHANICAL ANALYSIS OF THE 3-DIMENSIONAL MOTION OF CEMENTLESS HIP PROSTHESES [J].
GILBERT, JL ;
BLOOMFELD, RS ;
LAUTENSCHLAGER, EP ;
WIXSON, RL .
JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS, 1992, 25 (04) :329-340
[13]
TENDON EXCURSION AND DEHISCENCE DURING EARLY CONTROLLED MOBILIZATION AFTER FLEXOR TENDON REPAIR IN ZONE-II - AN X-RAY STEREOPHOTOGRAMMETIC ANALYSIS [J].
HAGBERG, L ;
SELVIK, G .
JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 1991, 16A (04) :669-680
[14]
THE EFFECT OF IMMEDIATE CONSTRAINED DIGITAL MOTION ON THE STRENGTH OF FLEXOR TENDON REPAIRS IN CHICKENS [J].
HITCHCOCK, TF ;
LIGHT, TR ;
BUNCH, WH ;
KNIGHT, GW ;
SARTORI, MJ ;
PATWARDHAN, AG ;
HOLLYFIELD, RL .
JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 1987, 12A (04) :590-595
[15]
COMPARATIVE FLEXOR TENDON EXCURSION AFTER PASSIVE MOBILIZATION - AN INVITRO STUDY [J].
HORII, E ;
LIN, GT ;
COONEY, WP ;
LINSCHEID, RL ;
AN, KN .
JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 1992, 17A (03) :559-566
[16]
TENSILE PROPERTIES OF THE SUPRASPINATUS TENDON [J].
ITOI, E ;
BERGLUND, LJ ;
GRABOWSKI, JJ ;
SCHULTZ, FM ;
GROWNEY, ES ;
MORREY, BF ;
AN, KN .
JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC RESEARCH, 1995, 13 (04) :578-584
[17]
Wrist and digital joint motion produce unique flexor tendon force and excursion in the canine forelimb [J].
Lieber, RL ;
Silva, MJ ;
Amiel, D ;
Gelberman, RH .
JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS, 1999, 32 (02) :175-181
[18]
Relationship between joint motion and flexor tendon force in the canine forelimb [J].
Lieber, RL ;
Amiel, D ;
Kaufman, KR ;
Whitney, J ;
Gelberman, RH .
JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 1996, 21A (06) :957-962
[19]
Lister G D, 1977, J Hand Surg Am, V2, P441
[20]
FACTORS IN ADHERENCE OF FLEXOR TENDON AFTER REPAIR - EXPERIMENTAL-STUDY IN RABBIT [J].
MATTHEWS, P ;
RICHARDS, H .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 1976, 58 (02) :230-236