Socio-psychological determinants of public acceptance of technologies: A review

被引:170
作者
Gupta, Nidhi [1 ]
Fischer, Arnout R. H.
Frewer, Lynn J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Wageningen Univ, Mkt & Consumer Behav Grp, Dept Social Sci, NL-6706 KN Wageningen, Netherlands
关键词
controversy; nanotechnology; public acceptance; socio-psychological determinants; technology; INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY; SOCIAL CONSTRUCTION; RISK COMMUNICATION; PERCEIVED RISK; ATTITUDES; NANOTECHNOLOGY; FOOD; PERCEPTION; BENEFITS; SCIENCE;
D O I
10.1177/0963662510392485
中图分类号
G2 [信息与知识传播];
学科分类号
05 ; 0503 ;
摘要
Historically, many technologies have been associated with societal controversies, leading to public rejection of their use. It is therefore important to understand the psychological determinants of societal acceptance of emerging technologies. Socio-psychological determinants of public acceptance of 10 (controversial) technologies are reviewed. The results indicate that there has been an increased interest in and focus on public acceptance of technologies in academia. Risk, trust, perceived benefit, knowledge, individual differences and attitude were found to have been a focus of research in 60% of articles. The results of correspondence analysis suggest that some determinants have been used more extensively in association with some technologies compared to others. As the published research has predominantly been conducted in North America and Europe, research across different cultural contexts internationally is required if globally relevant conclusions are to be reached. Implications for future research are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:782 / 795
页数:14
相关论文
共 58 条
[1]   Stakeholder attitudes towards the risks and benefits of genetically modified crops in South Africa [J].
Aerni, P .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & POLICY, 2005, 8 (05) :464-476
[2]   A PSYCHOLOGICAL-STUDY OF THE INVERSE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN PERCEIVED RISK AND PERCEIVED BENEFIT [J].
ALHAKAMI, AS ;
SLOVIC, P .
RISK ANALYSIS, 1994, 14 (06) :1085-1096
[3]   Belief in public efficacy, trust, and attitudes toward modern genetic science [J].
Barnett, J. ;
Cooper, H. ;
Senior, V. .
RISK ANALYSIS, 2007, 27 (04) :921-933
[4]   Genetically modified foods: the effect of information [J].
Batrinou, Anthimia M. ;
Dimitriou, Evangelia ;
Liatsos, Dionisios ;
Pletsa, Vassiliki .
NUTRITION & FOOD SCIENCE, 2005, 35 (03) :148-+
[5]   The public career of the 'gene' - trends in public sentiments from 1946 to 2002 [J].
Bauer, Martin W. .
NEW GENETICS AND SOCIETY, 2007, 26 (01) :29-45
[6]   Controversial medical and agri-food biotechnology: a cultivation analysis [J].
Bauer, MW .
PUBLIC UNDERSTANDING OF SCIENCE, 2002, 11 (02) :93-111
[7]   BIOTECH OR BIOWRECK - THE IMPLICATIONS OF JURASSIC-PARK AND GENETIC-ENGINEERING [J].
CHAPIN, SL ;
CHAPIN, LD .
BULLETIN OF SCIENCE TECHNOLOGY & SOCIETY, 1994, 14 (01) :19-23
[8]   Attitudes as an expression of knowledge and "political anchoring": The case of nuclear power in the United Kingdom [J].
Costa-Font, Joan ;
Rudisill, Caroline ;
Mossialos, Elias .
RISK ANALYSIS, 2008, 28 (05) :1273-1287
[9]  
Crow MM, 2001, NANOTECHNOLOGY SOC T
[10]  
Dale P. J., 2004, Journal of Commercial Biotechnology, V10, P199, DOI 10.1057/palgrave.jcb.3040075