Socio-psychological determinants of public acceptance of technologies: A review

被引:170
作者
Gupta, Nidhi [1 ]
Fischer, Arnout R. H.
Frewer, Lynn J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Wageningen Univ, Mkt & Consumer Behav Grp, Dept Social Sci, NL-6706 KN Wageningen, Netherlands
关键词
controversy; nanotechnology; public acceptance; socio-psychological determinants; technology; INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY; SOCIAL CONSTRUCTION; RISK COMMUNICATION; PERCEIVED RISK; ATTITUDES; NANOTECHNOLOGY; FOOD; PERCEPTION; BENEFITS; SCIENCE;
D O I
10.1177/0963662510392485
中图分类号
G2 [信息与知识传播];
学科分类号
05 ; 0503 ;
摘要
Historically, many technologies have been associated with societal controversies, leading to public rejection of their use. It is therefore important to understand the psychological determinants of societal acceptance of emerging technologies. Socio-psychological determinants of public acceptance of 10 (controversial) technologies are reviewed. The results indicate that there has been an increased interest in and focus on public acceptance of technologies in academia. Risk, trust, perceived benefit, knowledge, individual differences and attitude were found to have been a focus of research in 60% of articles. The results of correspondence analysis suggest that some determinants have been used more extensively in association with some technologies compared to others. As the published research has predominantly been conducted in North America and Europe, research across different cultural contexts internationally is required if globally relevant conclusions are to be reached. Implications for future research are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:782 / 795
页数:14
相关论文
共 58 条
[41]   Risk communication - Consumers between information and irritation [J].
Renn, Ortwin .
JOURNAL OF RISK RESEARCH, 2006, 9 (08) :833-849
[42]  
Ricci M, 2006, I CHEM ENG S SER MAN
[43]   Broader societal issues of nanotechnology [J].
Roco, MC .
JOURNAL OF NANOPARTICLE RESEARCH, 2003, 5 (3-4) :181-189
[44]   An introduction to nanotechnology policy: Opportunities and constraints for emerging and established economies [J].
Romig, A. D., Jr. ;
Baker, Arnold B. ;
Johannes, Justine ;
Zipperian, Thomas ;
Eijkel, Kees ;
Kirchhoff, Bruce ;
Mani, H. S. ;
Rao, C. N. R. ;
Walsh, Steven .
TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2007, 74 (09) :1634-1642
[45]   Framing effects on risk perception of nanotechnology [J].
Schuetz, Holger ;
Wiedemann, Peter M. .
PUBLIC UNDERSTANDING OF SCIENCE, 2008, 17 (03) :369-379
[46]   Issues affecting the acceptance of hydrogen fuel [J].
Schulte, I ;
Hart, D ;
van der Vorst, R .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2004, 29 (07) :677-685
[47]   Codex, memex, genex: The pursuit of transformational technologies [J].
Shneiderman, B .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HUMAN-COMPUTER INTERACTION, 1998, 10 (02) :87-106
[48]   Laypeople's and experts' perception of nanotechnology hazards [J].
Siegrist, Michael ;
Keller, Carmen ;
Kastenholz, Hans ;
Frey, Silvia ;
Wiek, Arnim .
RISK ANALYSIS, 2007, 27 (01) :59-69
[49]   Attitudes toward technology and risk:: Going beyond what is immediately given [J].
Sjöberg, L .
POLICY SCIENCES, 2002, 35 (04) :379-400
[50]   Information technology risks as seen by the public [J].
Sjöberg, L ;
Fromm, J .
RISK ANALYSIS, 2001, 21 (03) :427-441