The pharmacokinetics of extended-release formulations of calcium antagonists and of amlodipine in subjects with different gastrointestinal transit times

被引:13
作者
Zimmermann, T [1 ]
Laufen, H [1 ]
Yeates, R [1 ]
Scharpf, F [1 ]
Riedel, KD [1 ]
Schumacher, T [1 ]
机构
[1] Pfizer R&D Labs, Dept Pharmacol, D-89252 Illertissen, Germany
关键词
D O I
10.1177/00912709922011782
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
The influence of gastrointestinal (GI) transit times on the pharmacokinetics (PK) of three calcium channel blockers (CCBs), recommended for once-daily dosing, was investigated. In a three-way crossover design, the single-dose PK of a controlled-delivery formulation of 240 mg diltiazem (DIL), an extended-release formulation of 10 mg felodipine (FEL), and 5 mg amlodipine (AML) were compared in two groups of healthy subjects, with either slow (> 35 h) or rapid (< 15 h) GI transit, as assessed by the metal detector method (EAS II). GI transit significantly affected the PK of DIL. Mean PK parameters in the rapid versus slow transit group were the following: trough levels (C-24h: 22.8 +/- 8.3 versus 49.5 +/- 35.7 ng/ml, p < 0.05; AUC 1134.4 +/- 512.7 versus 1704.7 +/- 1185.6 hng/ml, p < 0.05 (one-sided). Neither AUC nor trough levels of FEL and AML were significantly influenced by transit times, nor was C-max after any of the three treatments. Variations in PK parameters, as indicated by coefficients of variation, were about twofold higher for both DIL and FEL, compared to AML. Variations in mean residence times were significantly lower for AML compared to DIL and FEL (7% vs. 30% and 17%, p < 0.001 and p < 0.002, respectively). Peak-to-trough ratios (C-max/C-24h mean) were 1.8 +/- 0.9 for DIL, 7.6 +/- 3.5 for FEL, and 1.7 +/- 0.2 for AML. In conclusion, the predictability of pharmacokinetic behavior both in conditions of rapid or slow GI transit is optimized in drugs with intrinsically slow elimination such as amlodipine. The pharmacokinetics of the CCBs with formulation-based once-a-day characteristics are sensitive to GI transit if these processes are rapid enough to interfere with the formulation-specific release profile. Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 1999;39:1021-1031 (C)1999 the American College of Clinical Pharmacology.
引用
收藏
页码:1021 / 1031
页数:11
相关论文
共 31 条
[11]  
DAVIS SS, 1992, EUR J NUCL MED, V19, P971
[12]   PATIENT COMPLIANCE AND THERAPEUTIC COVERAGE - COMPARISON OF AMLODIPINE AND SLOW-RELEASE NIFEDIPINE IN THE TREATMENT OF HYPERTENSION [J].
DETRY, JMR ;
BLOCK, P ;
DEBACKER, G ;
DEGAUTE, JP ;
SIX, R .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 1995, 47 (06) :477-481
[13]   CONCENTRATION-EFFECT ANALYSIS OF ANTIHYPERTENSIVE DRUG RESPONSE - FOCUS ON CALCIUM-ANTAGONISTS [J].
DONNELLY, R ;
ELLIOTT, HL ;
MEREDITH, PA .
CLINICAL PHARMACOKINETICS, 1994, 26 (06) :472-485
[14]  
EPSTEIN M, 1996, CARDIOVASC REV REP, V17, P30
[15]  
EWE K, 1995, ALIMENT PHARM THERAP, V9, P69
[16]   GASTROINTESTINAL TRANSIT OF UNDIGESTIBLE SOLIDS MEASURED BY METAL DETECTOR EAS-II [J].
EWE, K ;
PRESS, AG ;
DEDERER, W .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL INVESTIGATION, 1989, 19 (03) :291-297
[17]   PHARMACOKINETIC DRUG-INTERACTIONS WITH GASTROINTESTINAL MOTILITY MODIFYING AGENTS [J].
GREIFF, JMC ;
ROWBOTHAM, D .
CLINICAL PHARMACOKINETICS, 1994, 27 (06) :447-461
[18]   PHARMACOKINETIC CONSIDERATIONS IN GASTROINTESTINAL MOTOR DISORDERS [J].
HEBBARD, GS ;
SUN, WM ;
BOCHNER, F ;
HOROWITZ, M .
CLINICAL PHARMACOKINETICS, 1995, 28 (01) :41-66
[19]   PHARMACOKINETICS OF DILTIAZEM AFTER INTRAVENOUS AND ORAL-ADMINISTRATION [J].
HERMANN, P ;
RODGER, SD ;
REMONES, G ;
THENOT, JP ;
LONDON, DR ;
MORSELLI, PL .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 1983, 24 (03) :349-352
[20]  
KENNEDY M, 1987, BR J CLIN PHARM, V8, P372