Can usefulness of performance appraisal interviews change organizational justice perceptions? A 4-year longitudinal study among public sector employees

被引:21
作者
Linna, Anne [1 ]
Elovainio, Marko [2 ]
Van den Bos, Kees [3 ]
Kivimaki, Mika [4 ]
Pentti, Jaana [1 ]
Vahtera, Jussi [1 ]
机构
[1] Finnish Inst Occupat Hlth, Unit Excellence Psychosocial Factors, Turku, Finland
[2] Natl Inst Hlth & Welf, Dept Hlth Serv Res, Helsinki, Finland
[3] Univ Utrecht, Dept Social & Org Psychol, Utrecht, Netherlands
[4] Finnish Inst Occupat Hlth, Unit Excellence Psychosocial Factors, Helsinki, Finland
关键词
interactional justice; performance appraisal interview; procedural justice; usefulness; PROCEDURAL JUSTICE; CITIZENSHIP BEHAVIOR; SOCIAL-EXCHANGE; LABOR UNION; FAIRNESS; HEALTH; INEQUITY; IMPACT; MODEL; VOICE;
D O I
10.1080/09585192.2011.579915
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
This large-scale longitudinal study examined the hypothesis that the experienced usefulness of performance appraisal interviews affects justice perceptions and that changes in work life contribute to this effect. Our findings from 6592 employees who were nested in 1291 work groups over a 4-year period and who at baseline had not applied for a performance appraisal interview support this prediction. Specifically, the results of multilevel regression analyses showed that interviews that were experienced as useful improved justice perceptions significantly. In contrast, when the interviews were experienced as unhelpful, the impact on justice perceptions was negative. Furthermore, during negative changes in work life, useful interviews were especially important in helping prevent the deterioration of justice perceptions. The implications for organizational justice and the usefulness of the performance appraisal are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:1360 / 1375
页数:16
相关论文
共 58 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2009, UNDERSTANDING MANAGI
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2005, HDB ORG JUSTICE FUND
[3]  
Bernardin H.J., 1984, PERFORMANCE APPRAISA
[4]  
BIES RobertJ., 1986, Research on negotiation in organizations, P43, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1559-1816.2004.TB02581.X
[5]  
Bryk A. S., 1992, HIERARCHICAL LINEAR
[6]  
Cederblom D., 1982, ACAD MANAGE REV, V7, P219, DOI [10.2307/257300, DOI 10.5465/AMR.1982.4285572, DOI 10.2307/257300]
[7]   Effects of training in procedural justice on perceptions of disciplinary fairness by unionized employees and disciplinary subject matter experts [J].
Cole, ND ;
Latham, GP .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 1997, 82 (05) :699-705
[8]   Justice at the millennium: A meta-analytic review of 25 years of organizational justice research [J].
Colquitt, JA ;
Conlon, DE ;
Wesson, MJ ;
Porter, COLH ;
Ng, KY .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 2001, 86 (03) :425-445
[9]   Using social exchange theory to distinguish procedural from interactional justice [J].
Cropanzano, R ;
Prehar, CA ;
Chen, PY .
GROUP & ORGANIZATION MANAGEMENT, 2002, 27 (03) :324-351
[10]   Moral virtues, fairness heuristics, social entities, and other denizens of organizational justice [J].
Cropanzano, R ;
Byrne, ZS ;
Bobocel, DR ;
Rupp, DE .
JOURNAL OF VOCATIONAL BEHAVIOR, 2001, 58 (02) :164-209