Can usefulness of performance appraisal interviews change organizational justice perceptions? A 4-year longitudinal study among public sector employees

被引:21
作者
Linna, Anne [1 ]
Elovainio, Marko [2 ]
Van den Bos, Kees [3 ]
Kivimaki, Mika [4 ]
Pentti, Jaana [1 ]
Vahtera, Jussi [1 ]
机构
[1] Finnish Inst Occupat Hlth, Unit Excellence Psychosocial Factors, Turku, Finland
[2] Natl Inst Hlth & Welf, Dept Hlth Serv Res, Helsinki, Finland
[3] Univ Utrecht, Dept Social & Org Psychol, Utrecht, Netherlands
[4] Finnish Inst Occupat Hlth, Unit Excellence Psychosocial Factors, Helsinki, Finland
关键词
interactional justice; performance appraisal interview; procedural justice; usefulness; PROCEDURAL JUSTICE; CITIZENSHIP BEHAVIOR; SOCIAL-EXCHANGE; LABOR UNION; FAIRNESS; HEALTH; INEQUITY; IMPACT; MODEL; VOICE;
D O I
10.1080/09585192.2011.579915
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
This large-scale longitudinal study examined the hypothesis that the experienced usefulness of performance appraisal interviews affects justice perceptions and that changes in work life contribute to this effect. Our findings from 6592 employees who were nested in 1291 work groups over a 4-year period and who at baseline had not applied for a performance appraisal interview support this prediction. Specifically, the results of multilevel regression analyses showed that interviews that were experienced as useful improved justice perceptions significantly. In contrast, when the interviews were experienced as unhelpful, the impact on justice perceptions was negative. Furthermore, during negative changes in work life, useful interviews were especially important in helping prevent the deterioration of justice perceptions. The implications for organizational justice and the usefulness of the performance appraisal are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:1360 / 1375
页数:16
相关论文
共 58 条
[21]  
GRELLER MM, 1978, ACAD MANAGE J, V21, P646, DOI 10.5465/255705
[22]  
Heponiemi T., 2010, EUROPEAN J PUBLIC HL, V4, P1
[23]  
Holbrook R., 1999, SOC JUSTICE RES, V12, P205, DOI DOI 10.1023/A:1022196301372
[24]  
Holbrook R.L., 2002, Human Resource Management Review, V12, P101, DOI DOI 10.1016/S1053-4822
[25]   ESTIMATING WITHIN-GROUP INTERRATER RELIABILITY WITH AND WITHOUT RESPONSE BIAS [J].
JAMES, LR ;
DEMAREE, RG ;
WOLF, G .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 1984, 69 (01) :85-98
[26]  
Karasek R, 1998, J Occup Health Psychol, V3, P322, DOI 10.1037/1076-8998.3.4.322
[27]   Job values in today's workforce: A comparison of public and private sector employees [J].
Karl, KA ;
Sutton, CL .
PUBLIC PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT, 1998, 27 (04) :515-527
[28]   Performance appraisal reactions: Measurement, modeling, and method bias [J].
Keeping, LM ;
Levy, PE .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 2000, 85 (05) :708-723
[29]   MOTIVATING THE PRIVATE VS PUBLIC-SECTOR MANAGERS [J].
KHOJASTEH, M .
PUBLIC PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT, 1993, 22 (03) :391-401
[30]   Association between organizational inequity and incidence of psychiatric disorders in female employees [J].
Kivimäki, M ;
Elovainio, M ;
Vahtera, J ;
Virtanen, M ;
Stansfeld, SA .
PSYCHOLOGICAL MEDICINE, 2003, 33 (02) :319-326