Size-specific Dose Estimates for Adult Patients at CT of the Torso

被引:167
作者
Christner, Jodie A. [1 ]
Braun, Natalie N. [1 ]
Jacobsen, Megan C. [1 ]
Carter, Rickey E. [2 ]
Kofler, James M. [1 ]
McCollough, Cynthia H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Mayo Clin, Dept Radiol, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
[2] Mayo Clin, Dept Biomed Stat & Informat, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
关键词
TUBE CURRENT MODULATION; AUTOMATIC EXPOSURE CONTROL; COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY; REDUCTION;
D O I
10.1148/radiol.12112365
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
100231 [临床病理学]; 100902 [航空航天医学];
摘要
Purpose: To determine relationships among patient size, scanner radiation output, and size-specific dose estimates (SSDEs) for adults who underwent computed tomography (CT) of the torso. Materials and Methods: Informed consent was waived for this institutional review board-approved study of existing data from 545 adult patients (322 men, 223 women) who underwent clinically indicated CT of the torso between April 1, 2007, and May 13, 2007. Automatic exposure control was used to adjust scanner output for each patient according to the measured CT attenuation. The volume CT dose index (CTDIvol) was used with measurements of patient size (anterioposterior plus lateral dimensions) and the conversion factors from the American Association of Physicists in Medicine Report 204 to determine SSDE. Linear regression models were used to assess the dependence of CTDIvol and SSDE on patient size. Results: Patient sizes ranged from 42 to 84 cm. In this range, CTDIvol was significantly correlated with size (slope = 0.34 mGy/cm; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.31, 0.37 mGy/cm; R-2 = 0.48; P < .001), but SSDE was independent of size (slope = 0.02 mGy/cm; 95% CI: -0.02, 0.07 mGy/cm; R-2 = 0.003; P = .3). These R-2 values indicated that patient size explained 48% of the observed variability in CTDIvol but less than 1% of the observed variability in SSDE. The regression of CTDIvol versus patient size demonstrated that, in the 42-84-cm range, CTDIvol varied from 12 to 26 mGy. However, use of the evaluated automatic exposure control system to adjust scanner output for patient size resulted in SSDE values that were independent of size. Conclusion: For the evaluated automatic exposure control system, CTDIvol (scanner output) increased linearly with patient size; however, patient dose (as indicated by SSDE) was independent of size. (C) RSNA, 2012
引用
收藏
页码:841 / 847
页数:7
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]
[Anonymous], 96 AAPM TASK GROUP 2
[2]
[Anonymous], 1990, STAND METH MEAS DIAG
[3]
[Anonymous], 2011, 204 AM ASS PHYS MED
[4]
[Anonymous], 2000, 16262 EUR EN EUR COM
[5]
[Anonymous], [No title captured]
[6]
[Anonymous], IEC PUBL
[7]
[Anonymous], RAD SOC N AM SCI ASS
[8]
[Anonymous], AAPM POS STAT RAD RI
[9]
CT dosimetry: comparison of measurement techniques and devices [J].
Bauhs, John A. ;
Vrieze, Thomas J. ;
Primak, Andrew N. ;
Bruesewitz, Michael R. ;
McCollough, Cynthia H. .
RADIOGRAPHICS, 2008, 28 (01) :245-253
[10]
Dose reduction in CT by anatomically adapted tube current modulation. 1. Simulation studies [J].
Gies, M ;
Kalender, WA ;
Wolf, H ;
Suess, C ;
Madsen, MT .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1999, 26 (11) :2235-2247