Pollination of Ipomopsis aggregata (Polemoniaceae):: Effects of intra- vs. interspecific competition

被引:63
作者
Caruso, CM
机构
[1] Univ Illinois, Dept Ecol Ethol & Evolut, Champaign, IL 61820 USA
[2] Rocky Mt Biol Labs, Crested Butte, CO 81224 USA
关键词
Castilleja linariaefolia; competition; density dependence; Ipomopsis aggregata; Polemoniaceae; pollination;
D O I
10.2307/2656575
中图分类号
Q94 [植物学];
学科分类号
071001 ;
摘要
Although plants may simultaneously experience intra- and interspecific competition for pollination, their relative strength has rarely been experimentally evaluated. Yet because intra- and interspecific competition can be caused by different mechanisms, their effect on the ecology and evolution of plants may differ To determine the relative strength of intra- and interspecific competition for pollination, I manipulated the presence of heterospecifics and density of conspecifics using Ipomopsis aggregata as the focal species. All plots contained I. aggregata and Castilleja linariaefolia, but C. linariaefolia inflorescences were removed from half of the plots to create the heterospecifics-absent treatment. Within each plot, all I. aggregata inflorescences were removed from a 5-m radius around a focal plant to create a low conspecific density experimental unit, and a group of 12 1. aggregata plants/1 m(2) was designated as a high conspecific density unit. Conspecific pollen deposition was reduced when C. linariaefolia was present but was not influenced by I. aggregata density. Although seed set per fruit was reduced by 17% when C. linariaefolia was present, it was not significantly influenced by either treatment. Interspecific competition for pollination is stronger than intraspecific competition in the I. aggregata-C. linariaefolia system, but neither process appears to influence plant fitness.
引用
收藏
页码:663 / 668
页数:6
相关论文
共 43 条
[21]  
Kearns C.A., 1993, Techniques for pollination biologists
[22]   INFLUENCE OF ECONOMICS, INTERSPECIFIC COMPETITION, AND SEXUAL DIMORPHISM ON TERRITORIALITY OF MIGRANT RUFOUS HUMMINGBIRDS [J].
KODRICBROWN, A ;
BROWN, JH .
ECOLOGY, 1978, 59 (02) :285-296
[23]   THE EFFECT OF DELPHINIUM -NELSONII POLLEN ON SEED SET IN IPOMOPSIS-AGGREGATA, A COMPETITOR FOR HUMMINGBIRD POLLINATION [J].
KOHN, JR ;
WASER, NM .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BOTANY, 1985, 72 (07) :1144-1148
[24]   SEX AND THE SINGLE MUSTARD - POPULATION-DENSITY AND POLLINATOR BEHAVIOR EFFECTS ON SEED-SET [J].
KUNIN, WE .
ECOLOGY, 1993, 74 (07) :2145-2160
[25]   Population size and density effects in pollination: Pollinator foraging and plant reproductive success in experimental arrays of Brassica kaber [J].
Kunin, WE .
JOURNAL OF ECOLOGY, 1997, 85 (02) :225-234
[26]  
MITCHELL RJ, 1993, EVOLUTION, V47, P25, DOI 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1993.tb01196.x
[27]   Interspecific pollen loss by hummingbirds visiting flower mixtures: Effects of floral architecture [J].
Murcia, C ;
Feinsinger, P .
ECOLOGY, 1996, 77 (02) :550-560
[28]   COMPETITION FOR BUMBLEBEE POLLINATORS IN ROCKY-MOUNTAIN PLANT-COMMUNITIES [J].
PLEASANTS, JM .
ECOLOGY, 1980, 61 (06) :1446-1459
[29]   EXPERIMENTAL STUDIES OF POLLEN CARRYOVER - HUMMINGBIRDS AND IPOMOPSIS-AGGREGATA [J].
PRICE, MV ;
WASER, NM .
OECOLOGIA, 1982, 54 (03) :353-358
[30]  
Rathcke B., 1983, P305