High-resolution magnetic resonance angiography of the renal arteries using parallel imaging acquisition techniques at 3.0 T - Initial experience

被引:41
作者
Kramer, U
Nael, K
Laub, G
Nyborg, GK
Fenchel, M
Miller, S
Claussen, CD
Finn, JP
机构
[1] Univ Tubingen, Dept Diagnost Radiol, D-72076 Tubingen, Germany
[2] Univ Los Angeles, Dept Cardiovasc MR Res, Los Angeles, CA USA
[3] Siemens Med Syst Cardiovasc Ctr, Los Angeles, CA USA
关键词
MR angiography; renal arteries; MR; high field strength imaging; parallel imaging techniques;
D O I
10.1097/01.rli.0000195838.94440.20
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Objective: The purpose of this prospective study was to investigate the feasibility of high-resolution magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) of the kidneys at 3.0 T using parallel data acquisition. Material and Methods: Contrast-enhanced MRA of the renal arteries (RA) was performed in 12 Volunteers and 12 consecutive patients (mean age 47.1 +/- 16.3 years) on a 3.0 T MR scanner. For CEMRA, a high-resolution 3-dimensional GRE FLASH sequence was implemented. Images were assessed Subjectively on a 0 to 5 scoring scale by 2 reviewers. Quantitative evaluation was done by measuring the contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). Results: Diagnostic image quality was acquired in all individuals. In total, 62 RA were found, consisting of 48 main and 14 accessory RA. Overall visibility score for main R-A was 4.82 +/- 0.38. RA were identified up to the third-order branches in 88%. 111 3 of 12 patients, a hemodynamic relevant stenosis was found and proven by conventional angiogram. Conclusion: CEMRA at 3.0 T is advantageous in terms of better SNR and T1 weighting; therefore, measurement time can be reduced and spatial resolution can be increased without corruption of signal yield. Consequently, high-field MRA may be preferred for the evaluation of renal vascular anatomy in potential kidney donors or for the detection of renal artery stenosis.
引用
收藏
页码:125 / 132
页数:8
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]   Effect of field strengths on magnetic resonance angiography - Comparison of an ultrasmall superparamagnetic iron oxide blood-pool contrast agent and gadopentetate dimeglumine in rabbits at 1.5 and 3.0 tesla [J].
Allkemper, T ;
Heindel, W ;
Kooijman, H ;
Ebert, W ;
Tombach, B .
INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 2006, 41 (02) :97-104
[2]  
Bernstein MA, 2001, MAGNET RESON MED, V46, P955, DOI 10.1002/mrm.1282
[3]   Prospective navigator correction of image position for coronary MR angiography [J].
Danias, PG ;
McConnell, MV ;
Khasgiwala, VC ;
Chuang, ML ;
Edelman, RR ;
Manning, WJ .
RADIOLOGY, 1997, 203 (03) :733-736
[4]   Renal arterial stenosis: Prospective comparison of color Doppler US and breath-hold, three-dimensional, dynamic, gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography [J].
De Cobelli, F ;
Venturini, M ;
Vanzulli, A ;
Sironi, S ;
Salvioni, M ;
Angeli, E ;
Scifo, P ;
Garancini, MP ;
Quartagno, R ;
Bianchi, G ;
Del Maschio, A .
RADIOLOGY, 2000, 214 (02) :373-380
[5]   High-spatial-resolution contrast-enhanced MR angiography of the renal arteries: A prospective comparison with digital subtraction angiography [J].
Fain, SB ;
King, BF ;
Breen, JF ;
Kruger, DG ;
Riederer, SJ .
RADIOLOGY, 2001, 218 (02) :481-490
[6]   Preoperative evaluation of living renal donors:: value of contrast-enhanced 3D magnetic resonance angiography and comparison of three rendering algorithms [J].
Fink, C ;
Hallscheidt, PJ ;
Hosch, WP ;
Ott, RC ;
Wiesel, M ;
Kauffmann, GW ;
Düx, M .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2003, 13 (04) :794-801
[7]   MDCT of renal and mesenteric vessels [J].
Fleischmann, D .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2003, 13 (Suppl 5) :M94-M101
[8]   Dynamic MRI contrast enhancement of renal cortex: A functional assessment of renovascular disease in patients with renal artery stenosis [J].
Gandy, SJ ;
Sudarshan, TAP ;
Sheppard, DG ;
Allan, LC ;
McLeay, TB ;
Houston, JG .
JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2003, 18 (04) :461-466
[9]   Gadolinium-enhanced three-dimensional magnetic resonance angiography versus conventional digital subtraction angiography: Which modality is superior in evaluating living kidney donors? [J].
Giessing, M ;
Kroencke, TJ ;
Taupitz, M ;
Feldmann, C ;
Deger, S ;
Turk, I ;
Budde, K ;
Ebeling, V ;
Schoenberger, B ;
Loening, SA .
TRANSPLANTATION, 2003, 76 (06) :1000-1002
[10]   Generalized Autocalibrating Partially Parallel Acquisitions (GRAPPA) [J].
Griswold, MA ;
Jakob, PM ;
Heidemann, RM ;
Nittka, M ;
Jellus, V ;
Wang, JM ;
Kiefer, B ;
Haase, A .
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 2002, 47 (06) :1202-1210