Effect of field strengths on magnetic resonance angiography - Comparison of an ultrasmall superparamagnetic iron oxide blood-pool contrast agent and gadopentetate dimeglumine in rabbits at 1.5 and 3.0 tesla

被引:28
作者
Allkemper, T
Heindel, W
Kooijman, H
Ebert, W
Tombach, B
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Muenster, Dept Clin Radiol, D-48149 Munster, Germany
[2] Philips Med Syst, Hamburg, Germany
[3] Schering AG, Berlin, Germany
关键词
contrast media; magnetic resonance angiography; blood vessels; iron; field strength;
D O I
10.1097/01.rli.0000194779.02079.ce
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Objectives: We sought to compare the intravascular enhancement of an ultrasmall superparamagnetic iron oxide (USP10) blood-pool contrast agent to gadopentetate dimeglumine for contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (CE-MRA) at field strengths of 1.5 and 3.0 T in rabbits. Materials and Methods: CE-MRA at 1.5 and 3.0 T was performed at several time points (50 seconds and 5, 10, 20, and 30 minutes) after the manual intravenous injection of 40 mu mol Fe/kg body weight of an USPIO (SH U 555 C; Schering AG, Berlin, Germany) and 100 mu mol/kg body weight gadopentetate dimeglumine (Magnevist; Schering AG, Berlin, Germany). MRA was performed with comparable acquisition parameters at both field strengths (Turbo-gradient sequence; 1.5 T: TR/TE/alpha: 5.5/1.7 milliseconds/40 degrees; 3.0 T: TR/TE/a: 5.1/1.8 milliseconds/40 degrees) on clinical imaging systems (both: Gyroscan Intera, Philips Medical Systems, Best, The Netherlands). At either field strength, 6 rabbits were studied with both contrast agents (n = 24 in total). Signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were calculated from signal intensity measurements in the abdominal aorta. Results: Compared with 1.5 T, the SNR and CNR of gadopentetate dimeglumine significantly increased at 3.0 T by a factor of 2.2 and 2.3, respectively (P <= 0.01), measured 50 seconds after intravenous injection. SNR and CNR of SH U 555 C, measured 50 seconds after intravenous injection, did not change significantly with increasing field strength (P >= 0.05). At both field strength and either time point, CNR and SNR of SH U 555 C were significantly higher compared with gadopentetate dimeglumine at 3.0 T (P <= 0.01). Conclusions: SNR and CNR of gadopentetate dimeglumine significantly increased with increasing field strength. No SNR or CNR gain was observed for SH U 555 C. However, blood-pool MRA with SH U 555 C is feasible at 3.0 T. Compared with gadopentetate dimeglumine, SNR and CNR of SH U 555 C were significantly higher from 5 to 30 minutes at both field strengths (P <= 0.01).
引用
收藏
页码:97 / 104
页数:8
相关论文
共 64 条
[1]   Pulmonary MR angiography with ultrasmall superparamagnetic iron oxide particles as a blood pool agent and a navigator echo for respiratory gating:: Pilot study [J].
Ahlström, KH ;
Johansson, LO ;
Rodenburg, JB ;
Ragnarsson, AS ;
Åkeson, P ;
Börseth, A .
RADIOLOGY, 1999, 211 (03) :865-869
[2]   Vessel contrast at three Tesla in time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography of the intracranial and carotid arteries [J].
Al-Kwifi, O ;
Emery, DJ ;
Wilman, AH .
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2002, 20 (02) :181-187
[3]   Contrast-enhanced blood-pool MR angiography with optimized iron oxides: Effect of size and dose on vascular contrast enhancement in rabbits [J].
Allkemper, T ;
Bremer, C ;
Matuszewski, L ;
Ebert, W ;
Reimer, P .
RADIOLOGY, 2002, 223 (02) :432-438
[4]  
Atalay MK, 2001, MAGNET RESON MED, V45, P341, DOI 10.1002/1522-2594(200102)45:2<341::AID-MRM1043>3.0.CO
[5]  
2-Q
[6]   Effect of contrast dose and field strength in the magnetic resonance detection of brain metastases [J].
Ba-Ssalamah, A ;
Nöbauer-Huhmann, IM ;
Pinker, K ;
Schibany, N ;
Prokesch, R ;
Mehrain, S ;
Mlynárik, V ;
Fog, A ;
Heimberger, K ;
Trattnig, S .
INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 2003, 38 (07) :415-422
[7]  
Bernstein MA, 2001, MAGNET RESON MED, V46, P955, DOI 10.1002/mrm.1282
[8]   A NEW MACROMOLECULE AS A CONTRAST AGENT FOR MR-ANGIOGRAPHY - PREPARATION, PROPERTIES, AND ANIMAL STUDIES [J].
BOGDANOV, AA ;
WEISSLEDER, R ;
FRANK, HW ;
BOGDANOVA, AV ;
NOSSIF, N ;
SCHAFFER, BK ;
TSAI, E ;
PAPISOV, MI ;
BRADY, TJ .
RADIOLOGY, 1993, 187 (03) :701-706
[9]   Initial experiences with in vivo right coronary artery human MR vessel wall imaging at 3 tesla [J].
Botnar, RM ;
Stuber, M ;
Lamerichs, R ;
Smink, J ;
Fischer, SE ;
Harvey, P ;
Manning, WJ .
JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE, 2003, 5 (04) :589-594
[10]   RF MAGNETIC-FIELD PENETRATION, PHASE-SHIFT AND POWER DISSIPATION IN BIOLOGICAL TISSUE - IMPLICATIONS FOR NMR IMAGING [J].
BOTTOMLEY, PA ;
ANDREW, ER .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 1978, 23 (04) :630-643