Functional versus structural matching: Can the CTLp test be replaced by HLA allele typing?

Human leukocyte antigen (HLA) incompatibilities are the most important immunological barriers to bone marrow transplant Success when using unrelated donors. Until recently, standards for donor selection included serological methods for HLA class I antigens and DNA-based typing for HLA class II alleles. In our center cytotoxic T-lymphocyte precursor (CTLp) assays have been an integrated part of the search selection procedure as well. More recently, DNA-based typing for HLA class I became available. This allowed us to determine the correlation of CTLp frequencies directed against incompatibilities at the HLA-A. -B, and -C locus in 211 donor-recipient pairs. HLA class I incompatibilities are significantly (p < 0.001) associated with high CTLp frequencies. Exceptions did Occur, high CTLp frequencies are seen in I of the HLA-A. -B, and -C allele matched pairs, whereas in 7% of the pairs mismatched for HLA-A or -B if low CTLp frequency occurred. The successful outcome 4 transplants - performed in the latter cases suggest that the CTLp test can be used as a toot to detect permissible mismatches when no fully matched donor is available. The influence of HLA-C mismatches on the CTLp outcome was less clear. Although in the majority of mismatched pairs (64%) the CTLp Frequency was high, in 367, of the pairs the CTLp was low. Analysis of HLA amino acid sequences was performed on the HLA-C allele mismatched group. An amino acid difference was always found at five polymorplic positions 97, 99, 113, 114, and 116 situated at the peptide binding groove in the high CTLp frequency group, whereas in the low CTLp frequency group this was observed in only 9 of 17 combinations (P < 0.001). However, this is mainly due to Cw*0303-0304 mismatches. In conclusion. although there is a highly significant correlation between the outcome of the CTLp frequency test and HLA allele class I typing, exceptions Occur. It is unclear whether they are all clinically relevant but they certainly provide additional insight in allograft recognition. Human Immunology 63. 1 176-184 (2002). (C) American Society for Histocompatibility and Immunogenetics, 2002, Published by Elsevier Science Inc.