Kinetic plot and particle size distribution analysis to discuss the performance limits of sub-2 μm and supra-2 μm particle columns

被引:36
作者
Cabooter, Deirdre [1 ]
Billen, Jeroen [1 ]
Terryn, Herman [2 ]
Lynen, Frederic [3 ]
Sandra, Pat [3 ]
Desmet, Gert [1 ]
机构
[1] Vrije Univ Brussel, Dept Chem Engn, B-1050 Brussels, Belgium
[2] Vrije Univ Brussel, Dept Mat & Chem, B-1050 Brussels, Belgium
[3] PARC, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium
关键词
kinetic plot; column performance; particle size distribution (PSD); sub- and supra-2 mu m particles; liquid chromatography;
D O I
10.1016/j.chroma.2008.07.007
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学];
学科分类号
071010 [生物化学与分子生物学]; 081704 [应用化学];
摘要
To contribute to the current debate about the "ideal" particle size range (sub-2 mu m vs. supra-2 mu m), the present study compares the kinetic performance of some commercially available sub-2 mu m and 3.5 mu m particles used under quasi-adiabatic conditions via the kinetic plot method. Under the adopted assumption that viscous heating effects can be neglected (which is uncertain in a pressure range above 400 bar), the obtained kinetic plots show that, provided each particle size is used in a column with properly optimized length, the gain in separation speed that sub-2 mu m particle columns might have over maximally performing 2.5 mu m particle columns is very small. Sub-2 mu m particle columns can only yield a gain in separation speed in the range of high-speed/low-resolution-separations (total time based on k = 10 below 5 or 10min). And even in this range, the actual gain that can be expected is only marginally small (only a few %). The present study hence suggests that the development and the use of particles in the 2-3 mu m range should deserve more attention than it did in the past few years. However, to be competitive, this 2-3 mu m material should be packed in relatively long columns, with a packing quality matching that of the current best performing 3.5 mu m particle columns. The supra-2 mu m particles should also be able to withstand the same pressures as the sub-2 mu m particle material one is comparing it to. (c) 2008 Published by Elsevier B.V.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 10
页数:10
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]
Allen T, 1968, PARTICLE SIZE MEASUR
[2]
[Anonymous], 1965, DYNAMICS CHROMATOGRA
[3]
Relation between the particle size distribution and the kinetic performance of packed columns -: Application to a commercial sub-2 μm particle material [J].
Billen, Jeroen ;
Guillarme, Davy ;
Rudaz, Serge ;
Veuthey, Jean-Luc ;
Ritchie, Harald ;
Grady, Brian ;
Desmet, Gert .
JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A, 2007, 1161 (1-2) :224-233
[4]
STANDARDIZATION OF TEST CONDITIONS FOR HIGH-PERFORMANCE LIQUID-CHROMATOGRAPHY COLUMNS [J].
BRISTOW, PA ;
KNOX, JH .
CHROMATOGRAPHIA, 1977, 10 (06) :279-289
[5]
Use of the kinetic plot method to analyze commercial high-temperature liquid chromatography systems I: Intrinsic performance comparison [J].
Cabooter, D. ;
Heinisch, S. ;
Rocca, J. L. ;
Clicq, D. ;
Desmet, G. .
JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A, 2007, 1143 (1-2) :121-133
[6]
Detailed characterisation of the flow resistance of commercial sub-2 μm reversed-phase columns [J].
Cabooter, Deirdre ;
Billen, Jeroen ;
Terryn, Herman ;
Lynen, Frederic ;
Sandra, Pat ;
Desmet, Gert .
JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A, 2008, 1178 (1-2) :108-117
[7]
Method to predict and compare the influence of the particle size on the isocratic peak capacity of high-performance liquid chromatography columns [J].
Cabooter, Deirdre ;
de Villiers, Andre ;
Clicq, David ;
Szucs, Roman ;
Sandra, Pat ;
Desmet, Gert .
JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A, 2007, 1147 (02) :183-191
[8]
Use of the kinetic plot method to analyze commercial high-temperature liquid chromatography systems - II. Practically constrained performance comparison [J].
Clicq, D. ;
Heinisch, S. ;
Rocca, J. L. ;
Cabooter, D. ;
Gzil, P. ;
Desmet, G. .
JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A, 2007, 1146 (02) :193-201
[9]
COULSON JM, 1999, CHEM ENG, V2
[10]
Fused-core particle technology as an alternative to sub-2-αm particles to achieve high separation efficiency with low backpressure [J].
Cunliffe, Jennifer M. ;
Maloney, Todd D. .
JOURNAL OF SEPARATION SCIENCE, 2007, 30 (18) :3104-3109