A new flavor-coated sachet bait for delivering oral rabies vaccine to raccoons and coyotes

被引:29
作者
Linhart, SB [1 ]
Wlodkowski, JC
Kavanaugh, DM
Motes-Kreimeyer, L
Montoney, AJ
Chipman, RB
Slate, D
Bigler, LL
Fearneyhough, MG
机构
[1] Univ Georgia, Coll Vet Med, SE Cooperat Wildlife Dis Study, Athens, GA 30602 USA
[2] Merial Ltd, Div Biol, Biol Dev, Athens, GA 30601 USA
[3] Anim & Plant Hlth Inspect Serv, USDA, Wildlife Serv, Columbus, OH 43215 USA
[4] Anim & Plant Hlth Inspect Serv, USDA, Wildlife Serv, Concord, NH 03301 USA
[5] Cornell Univ, Coll Vet Med, Diagnost Lab, Zoonot Dis Sect, Ithaca, NY 14852 USA
[6] Texas Dept Hlth, Zoonoses Control Div, Austin, TX 78756 USA
关键词
baits; Canis latrans; coyote; oral vaccination; Procyon lotor; rabies; raccoon;
D O I
10.7589/0090-3558-38.2.363
中图分类号
S85 [动物医学(兽医学)];
学科分类号
0906 ;
摘要
Research was conducted during 1996-2000 to develop baits for delivering an oral rabies vaccine to raccoons (Procyon lotor) and coyotes (Canis latrans). A bait was sought that: (1) was attractive to the target species, (2) could be distributed by aircraft, (3) was as effective (or more so) than the currently used fish meal polymer bait, and (4) could be produced in large numbers by automated procedures and could be purchased by user groups at substantially lower cost. Ten field trials were conducted to document raccoons' bait flavor preferences, evaluate a new vaccine sachet bait coated with various attractants, and determine if the sachet bait would effectively deliver Raboral V-RG(R) oral rabies vaccine (Merial Limited, Athens, Georgia, USA) to this species. Raccoons preferred fish and crustacean-based flavors over those derived from plant materials. Raccoon visits to tracking stations, frequency of bait removals, and percent of sachets discarded by this species that were emptied of placebo vaccine indicated efficacy of the new bait was equal or superior to the currently used fish meal polymer bait. A field trial conducted in fall 1998 compared aerially distributed vaccine-laden sachet and polymer baits and showed there was no difference between the percent of raccoons from the test and reference areas subsequently found positive for rabies antibody. Four bait trials to determine coyote response to sachet baits were conducted in 1997-98. The propensity for canids to gulp or bolt smaller food items is well known. Thus, a first trial involved offering fish-flavored sachet baits of different sizes to 30 captive coyotes to determine if smaller size baits were more frequently swallowed intact. Two field trials were also conducted in fall 1997 to determine if free-ranging coyotes discriminated among sachet baits coated with different attractants. Finally, Raboral V-RG(R)-laden poultry-flavored sachet baits were aerially dropped and the percent of seropositive coyotes was compared with coyotes from surrounding areas where fish meal polymer vaccine baits had been distributed. Captive coyotes did not swallow sachet baits intact, regardless of size. Bait preference field trials indicated that coyotes preferred poultry, cheese/beef tallow, and fish-flavored sachet baits and that such baits were taken at the same rate as polymer baits. A sample of coyotes from the area baited with vaccine-laden sachet baits had a markedly higher (P = 0.01) seropositivity rate than coyotes from areas where vaccine was distributed in polymer baits. Sachet bait production could be facilitated by automated technology and sachet baits used either as an alternative vaccine delivery device or in combination with the fish meal polymer bait.
引用
收藏
页码:363 / 377
页数:15
相关论文
共 26 条
  • [1] FIELD-EVALUATION OF BAITS AND BAITING STRATEGIES FOR DELIVERING ORAL VACCINE TO MONGOOSES IN ANTIGUA, WEST-INDIES
    CREEKMORE, TE
    LINHART, SB
    CORN, JL
    WHITNEY, MD
    SNYDER, BD
    NETTLES, VF
    [J]. JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE DISEASES, 1994, 30 (04) : 497 - 505
  • [2] Efficacy of bait distributional strategies to deliver canine rabies vaccines to coyotes in southern Texas
    Farry, SC
    Henke, SE
    Beasom, SL
    Fearneyhough, MG
    [J]. JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE DISEASES, 1998, 34 (01) : 23 - 32
  • [3] Responses of captive and free-ranging coyotes to simulated oral rabies vaccine baits
    Farry, SC
    Henke, SE
    Anderson, AM
    Fearneyhough, MG
    [J]. JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE DISEASES, 1998, 34 (01) : 13 - 22
  • [4] Fearneyhough MG, 1998, J AM VET MED ASSOC, V212, P498
  • [5] A FIELD TRIAL TO DETERMINE THE FEASIBILITY OF DELIVERING ORAL VACCINES TO WILD SWINE
    FLETCHER, WO
    CREEKMORE, TE
    SMITH, MS
    NETTLES, VF
    [J]. JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE DISEASES, 1990, 26 (04) : 502 - 510
  • [6] Hanlon CA, 1999, J AM VET MED ASSOC, V215, P1612
  • [7] PROPOSED FIELD-EVALUATION OF A RABIES RECOMBINANT VACCINE FOR RACCOONS (PROCYON-LOTOR) - SITE SELECTION, TARGET SPECIES CHARACTERISTICS, AND PLACEBO BAITING TRIALS
    HANLON, CL
    HAYES, DE
    HAMIR, AN
    SNYDER, DE
    JENKINS, S
    HABLE, CP
    RUPPRECHT, CE
    [J]. JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE DISEASES, 1989, 25 (04) : 555 - 567
  • [8] A modified bait for oral delivery of biological agents to raccoons and feral swine
    Kavanaugh, DM
    Linhart, SB
    [J]. JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE DISEASES, 2000, 36 (01) : 86 - 91
  • [9] Krebs JW, 1999, J AM VET MED ASSOC, V215, P1786
  • [10] A FIELD-EVALUATION OF BAITS FOR DELIVERING ORAL RABIES VACCINES TO RACCOONS (PROCYON-LOTOR)
    LINHART, SB
    BLOM, FS
    ENGEMAN, RM
    HILL, HL
    HON, T
    HALL, DI
    SHADDOCK, JH
    [J]. JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE DISEASES, 1994, 30 (02) : 185 - 194