Quantitative diffusion tensor MR imaging of the brain: field strength related variance of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and fractional anisotropy (FA) scalars

被引:117
作者
Huisman, Thierry A. G. M.
Loenneker, Thomas
Barta, Gerd
Bellemann, Matthias E.
Hennig, Juergen
Fischer, Joachim E.
Il'yasov, Kamil A.
机构
[1] Univ Zurich, Childrens Hosp, Dept Diagnost Imaging, CH-8032 Zurich, Switzerland
[2] Univ Freiburg, Dept Diagnost Radiol, Sect Med Phys, Freiburg, Germany
[3] Univ Appl Sci Jena, Dept Med Engn, Jena, Germany
[4] Univ Zurich, Childrens Hosp, Growth & Dev Ctr, Zurich, Switzerland
关键词
diffusion tensor imaging; apparent diffusion coefficient; fractional anisotropy; magnetic field strength;
D O I
10.1007/s00330-006-0175-8
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
The objectives were to study the "impact" of the magnetic field strength on diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) metrics and also to determine whether magnetic-field-related differences in T2-relaxation times of brain tissue influence DTI measurements. DTI was performed on 12 healthy volunteers at 1.5 and 3.0 Tesla (within 2 h) using identical DTI scan parameters. Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and fractional anisotropy (FA) values were measured at multiple gray and white matter locations. ADC and FA values were compared and analyzed for statistically significant differences. In addition, DTI measurements were performed at different echo times (TE) for both field strengths. ADC values for gray and white matter were statistically significantly lower at 3.0 Tesla compared with 1.5 Tesla (% change between -1.94% and -9.79%). FA values were statistically significantly higher at 3.0 Tesla compared with 1.5 Tesla (% change between +4.04 and 11.15%). ADC and FA values are not significantly different for TE=91 ms and TE=125 ms. Thus, ADC and FA values vary with the used field strength. Comparative clinical studies using ADC or FA values should consequently compare ADC or FA results with normative ADC or FA values that have been determined for the field strength used.
引用
收藏
页码:1651 / 1658
页数:8
相关论文
共 48 条
[1]  
Basser PJ, 1996, J MAGN RESON SER B, V111, P209, DOI [10.1006/jmrb.1996.0086, 10.1016/j.jmr.2011.09.022]
[2]   Anisotropic noise propagation in diffusion tensor MRI sampling schemes [J].
Batchelor, PG ;
Atkinson, D ;
Hill, DLG ;
Calamante, F ;
Connelly, A .
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 2003, 49 (06) :1143-1151
[3]   High b-value diffusion-weighted MRI of normal brain [J].
Burdette, JH ;
Durden, DD ;
Elster, AD ;
Yen, YF .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY, 2001, 25 (04) :515-519
[4]   Investigation of MS normal-appearing brain using diffusion tenser MRI with clinical correlations [J].
Ciccarelli, O ;
Werring, DJ ;
Wheeler-Kingshott, CAM ;
Barker, GJ ;
Parker, GJM ;
Thompson, AJ ;
Miller, DH .
NEUROLOGY, 2001, 56 (07) :926-933
[5]   Diffusion MRI: Precision, accuracy and flow effects [J].
Conturo, TE ;
McKinstry, RC ;
Aronovitz, JA ;
Neil, JJ .
NMR IN BIOMEDICINE, 1995, 8 (7-8) :307-332
[6]   MAGNETIC-RESONANCE IMAGING - EFFECTS OF MAGNETIC-FIELD STRENGTH [J].
CROOKS, LE ;
ARAKAWA, M ;
HOENNINGER, J ;
MCCARTEN, B ;
WATTS, J ;
KAUFMAN, L .
RADIOLOGY, 1984, 151 (01) :127-133
[7]   Diffusion tensor imaging of partial intractable epilepsy [J].
de la Roque, AD ;
Oppenheim, C ;
Chassoux, F ;
Rodrigo, S ;
Beuvon, F ;
Daumas-Duport, C ;
Devaux, B ;
Meder, JF .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2005, 15 (02) :279-285
[8]  
DeLano MC, 2000, AM J NEURORADIOL, V21, P1830
[9]  
Dietrich O, 2001, MAGNET RESON MED, V45, P448, DOI 10.1002/1522-2594(200103)45:3<448::AID-MRM1059>3.0.CO
[10]  
2-W