Attentional set-shifting in mice:: modification of a rat paradigm, and evidence for strain-dependent variation

被引:106
作者
Colacicco, G
Welzl, H
Lipp, HP
Würbel, H
机构
[1] Univ Zurich, Inst Lab Anim Sci, CH-8057 Zurich, Switzerland
[2] Univ Zurich, Inst Anat, Div Neuroanat & Behav, CH-8057 Zurich, Switzerland
关键词
behaviour; learning; attention; set shifting; prefrontal cortex; mouse;
D O I
10.1016/S0166-4328(01)00391-6
中图分类号
B84 [心理学]; C [社会科学总论]; Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 030303 ; 04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Increasingly precise molecular genetic tools are available to study in mice the cellular mechanisms underlying complex brain functions, but the behavioural paradigms to assess these functions often lack the required specificity. In this study, an attentional set-shifting paradigm to assess medial frontal cortex functions in rats was modified for use in mice and variation between two relevant mouse strains assessed. Male 129/SvEv and C57BL/6J mice and their F1 intercross (n = 8 per genotype) were trained to dig in bowls for a food reward, On four consecutive days, mice performed a series of discriminations to criterion (six consecutive correct choices) between pairs of food bowls that differed along two dimensions (odour, digging medium), including a reversal, an intra-dimensional shift, and an extra-dimensional shift. Mice from the 129 strain performed significantly better than C57 mice in the initial acquisition of a simple discrimination and in the final extra-dimensional shift test, with no difference in the reversal and intra-dimensional shift. Performance of the F I mice was intermediate or similar to that of the 129 mice. These results indicate a selective difference between these two strains in attentional selection processes that have been shown in humans. monkeys and rats to be mediated by prefrontal cortex. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:95 / 102
页数:8
相关论文
共 41 条
[21]  
LUSH IM, 1988, GENET RES, V53, P95
[22]   Inducible and reversible gene expression with the rtTA system for the study of memory [J].
Mansuy, IM ;
Winder, DG ;
Moallem, TM ;
Osman, M ;
Mayford, M ;
Hawkins, RD ;
Kandel, ER .
NEURON, 1998, 21 (02) :257-265
[23]   The prefrontal cortex and cognitive control [J].
Miller, EK .
NATURE REVIEWS NEUROSCIENCE, 2000, 1 (01) :59-65
[24]  
Milner B., 1964, FRONTAL GRANULAR COR, P313
[25]   Behavioural performance in three substrains of mouse strain 129 [J].
Montkowski, A ;
Poettig, M ;
Mederer, A ;
Holsboer, F .
BRAIN RESEARCH, 1997, 762 (1-2) :12-18
[26]   SPATIAL LOCALIZATION DOES NOT REQUIRE THE PRESENCE OF LOCAL CUES [J].
MORRIS, RGM .
LEARNING AND MOTIVATION, 1981, 12 (02) :239-260
[27]   CONTRASTING MECHANISMS OF IMPAIRED ATTENTIONAL SET-SHIFTING IN PATIENTS WITH FRONTAL-LOBE DAMAGE OR PARKINSONS-DISEASE [J].
OWEN, AM ;
ROBERTS, AC ;
HODGES, JR ;
SUMMERS, BA ;
POLKEY, CE ;
ROBBINS, TW .
BRAIN, 1993, 116 :1159-1175
[28]   Comparison of set-shifting ability in patients with chronic schizophrenia and frontal lobe damage [J].
Pantelis, C ;
Barber, FZ ;
Barnes, TRE ;
Nelson, HE ;
Owen, AM ;
Robbins, TW .
SCHIZOPHRENIA RESEARCH, 1999, 37 (03) :251-270
[29]   A comparison of the effects of hippocampal or prefrontal cortical lesions on three versions of delayed non-matching-to-sample based on positional or spatial cues [J].
Porter, MC ;
Burk, JA ;
Mair, RG .
BEHAVIOURAL BRAIN RESEARCH, 2000, 109 (01) :69-81
[30]   DO RATS HAVE PREFRONTAL CORTEX - THE ROSE-WOOLSEY-AKERT PROGRAM RECONSIDERED [J].
PREUSS, TM .
JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 1995, 7 (01) :1-24