Assessment of activities of daily living with an ambulatory monitoring system: a comparative study in patients with chronic low back pain and nonsymptomatic controls

被引:86
作者
Spenkelink, CD
Hutten, MMR
Hermens, HJ
Greitemann, BOL
机构
[1] Roessingh Res & Dev, NL-7522 AH Enschede, Netherlands
[2] Klin Munsterland, Bad Rothenfelde, Germany
关键词
D O I
10.1191/0269215502cr463oa
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
Objective: The aim of this study was twofold: (1) to investigate whether differences in activities of daily living exist between patients with chronic low back pain (CLBP) and nonsymptomatic controls; (2) to investigate the day-today variability in daily activities. Design: Physical activities were measured over a 24-hour period with an ambulant monitoring system. Setting: Measurements were carried out in the subject's own environment. Subjects: Forty-seven CLBP patients and 10 nonsymptomatic controls participated in this study. Results: On group level, CLBP patients show a lower activity pattern compared with controls, especially during the evening. This is reflected in a lower walking step frequency during the day and evening, more lying time during the day and a lower physical activity level, less standing time and more lying time during the evening. The day-to-day variability in activity pattern is high and similar for both the patient and control group. Conclusion: The lower activity level especially found during the evening might indicate that patients need all their capacity to perform the tasks imposed during the day and as a consequence have less capacity left for their leisure time, in general the evening. This suggests the existence of an imbalance between the patient's physical capacity and the imposed environmental load. The large but similar day-to-day variability in activity pattern, which does not support the clinical findings of 'bad days' in CLBP patients, suggests the need for repeated measures.
引用
收藏
页码:16 / 26
页数:11
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]  
Bland JM, 1996, BRIT MED J, V313, P744
[2]  
Bolten W, 1998, MED KLIN, V93, P388, DOI 10.1007/BF03044686
[3]  
Bullinger M, 1996, Rehabilitation (Stuttg), V35, pXVII
[4]   Ambulatory monitoring of children's activity [J].
Busser, HJ ;
Ott, J ;
vanLummel, RC ;
Uiterwaal, M ;
Blank, R .
MEDICAL ENGINEERING & PHYSICS, 1997, 19 (05) :440-445
[5]  
Bussmann J.B.J., 1995, EUR J PHYS MED REHAB, V5, P2
[6]   Techniques for measurement and assessment of mobility in rehabilitation: a theoretical approach [J].
Bussmann, JBJ ;
Stam, HJ .
CLINICAL REHABILITATION, 1998, 12 (06) :455-464
[7]  
DELITTO A, 1994, PHYS THER, V74, P83
[8]   ETIOLOGICAL THEORIES AND TREATMENTS FOR CHRONIC BACK PAIN .1. SOMATIC MODELS AND INTERVENTIONS [J].
FLOR, H ;
TURK, DC .
PAIN, 1984, 19 (02) :105-121
[9]   THE SICKNESS IMPACT PROFILE - A GLOBAL MEASURE OF DISABILITY IN CHRONIC LOW-BACK PAIN [J].
FOLLICK, MJ ;
SMITH, TW ;
AHERN, DK .
PAIN, 1985, 21 (01) :67-76
[10]   BACK PAIN AND SCIATICA [J].
FRYMOYER, JW .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1988, 318 (05) :291-300