Developing stakeholder theory

被引:584
作者
Friedman, AL
Miles, S
机构
[1] Univ Bristol, Management Res Ctr, Bristol BS8 1TT, Avon, England
[2] Oxford Brookes Univ, Oxford OX3 0BP, England
关键词
D O I
10.1111/1467-6486.00280
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Previous literature has led to a lack of appreciation of the range of organization /stakeholder relations that can occur; the extent to which such relations change over time; as well as how and wiry such changes occur. In particular, extremely negative and highly conflicting relations between organizations and stakeholders have been ignored. Due to this lack of appreciation it is argued that current attempts at integrating the separate strands of stakeholder theory to achieve a convergent stakeholder theory are premature. A model is presented which combines stakeholder theory with a realist theory of social change and differentiation. This model is intended to highlight why it is important to distinguish different stakeholders. The model also enables an analysis of the organization/stakeholder relationship, which is not exclusively from the organization perspective and which is capable of illuminating why and how organization/stakeholder relations change over time. The history of Greenpeace is used as an example.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 21
页数:21
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]   Who matters to CEOs? An investigation of stakeholder attributes and salience, corporate performance, and CEO values [J].
Agle, BR ;
Mitchell, RK ;
Sonnenfeld, JA .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 1999, 42 (05) :507-525
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1995, BUSINESS ETHICS Q
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1995, SMALL IS STUPID BLOW
[4]  
[Anonymous], POSTMODERN MANAGEMEN
[5]  
Archer M., 1996, CULTURE AGENCY PLACE
[6]  
Archer Margaret Scotford, 1995, REALIST SOCIAL THEOR, DOI DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511557675
[7]  
Bhaskar Roy., 1989, POSSIBILITY NATURALI
[8]  
BLOEDEL M, 1994, VANCOUVER SUN 0307
[9]  
Bryant Christopher G. A., 1991, GIDDENS THEORY STRUC
[10]   THE STAKEHOLDER THEORY OF THE CORPORATION - CONCEPTS, EVIDENCE, AND IMPLICATIONS [J].
DONALDSON, T ;
PRESTON, LE .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 1995, 20 (01) :65-91