The five pillar EPPS framework for quantifying, mapping and managing ecosystem services

被引:77
作者
Bastian, Olaf [1 ]
Syrbe, Ralf-Uwe [1 ]
Rosenberg, Matthias [1 ]
Rahe, Doreen [1 ]
Grunewald, Karsten [1 ]
机构
[1] Leibniz Inst Ecol Urban & Reg Dev, D-01217 Dresden, Germany
关键词
Ecosystem properties; potentials; services; benefits; Monetary values; Land-use change modelling tool; Saxony; Soil erosion; Yield losses;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecoser.2013.04.003
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
This paper introduces an ecosystem services assessment framework with five pillars: ecosystem properties, potentials, services, benefits/values, and beneficiaries. In a case study in the district of Gorlitz (Eastern Saxony, Germany), we present an exemplary application for two ecosystem services: crop food production and soil erosion regulation. The farmland of the district can produce a total of about 518,000 t of crop food (rye) per year, depending on yield potential. Corrected for the mean price of the crop rye, this translates to a value of about 100 million (sic) annually. At the same time, 606,000 t of soil loss must be calculated per year, which corresponds to 36 million (sic) in damages. If 7% of the farmland were to be transformed into grassland or forest, the provisioning service would sink by 37,000 t of rye, for an income loss of approx. (sic)7.4 million per year. On the other hand, soil erosion regulation would be enhanced and soil loss would be reduced by c. 20%, corresponding to on-site benefit of (sic)7.1 million. Within a more intensively used partial study area (with dominating loess soils), the benefits of the erosion regulation service ((sic)656,000) exceed the yield losses ((sic)245,000) more than twice. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:15 / 24
页数:10
相关论文
共 32 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2010, PROPOSAL COMMON INT
  • [2] Bastian Olaf, 2012, International Journal of Biodiversity Science Ecosystem Services & Management, V8, P5, DOI 10.1080/21513732.2011.631941
  • [3] Ecosystem properties, potentials and services - The EPPS conceptual framework and an urban application example
    Bastian, Olaf
    Haase, Dagmar
    Grunewald, Karsten
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2012, 21 : 7 - 16
  • [4] Bork H.R., 2002, OFFENHALTUNG LANDSCH, V33, P11
  • [5] Mapping ecosystem service supply, demand and budgets
    Burkhard, Benjamin
    Kroll, Franziska
    Nedkov, Stoyan
    Mueller, Felix
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2012, 21 : 17 - 29
  • [6] The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital
    Costanza, R
    dArge, R
    deGroot, R
    Farber, S
    Grasso, M
    Hannon, B
    Limburg, K
    Naeem, S
    ONeill, RV
    Paruelo, J
    Raskin, RG
    Sutton, P
    vandenBelt, M
    [J]. NATURE, 1997, 387 (6630) : 253 - 260
  • [7] Function-analysis and valuation as a tool to assess land use conflicts in planning for sustainable, multi-functional landscapes
    de Groot, R
    [J]. LANDSCAPE AND URBAN PLANNING, 2006, 75 (3-4) : 175 - 186
  • [8] de Groot RS., 2010, ECOL COMPLEX, V6, P453, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.ECOCOM.2009.10.006
  • [9] Ecosystem services: Classification for valuation
    Fisher, Brendan
    Turner, R. Kerry
    [J]. BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2008, 141 (05) : 1167 - 1169
  • [10] Defining and classifying ecosystem services for decision making
    Fisher, Brendan
    Turner, R. Kerry
    Morling, Paul
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2009, 68 (03) : 643 - 653