Reproducibility of LC-MS-based protein identification

被引:24
作者
Berg, M
Parbel, A
Pettersen, H
Fenyö, D
Björkesten, L
机构
[1] GE Healthcare, D-80807 Munich, Germany
[2] GE Healthcare, Uppsala, Sweden
关键词
DeCyder (TM) MS; differential expression analysis; LC-MS; reproducibility; reversed phase chromatography; nano LC; tandem mass spectrometry;
D O I
10.1093/jxb/erj139
中图分类号
Q94 [植物学];
学科分类号
071001 ;
摘要
Traditional analysis of liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS) data, typically performed by reviewing chromatograms and the corresponding mass spectra, is both time-consuming and difficult. Detailed data analysis is therefore often omitted in proteomics applications. When analysing multiple proteomics samples, it is usually only the final list of identified proteins that is reviewed. This may lead to unnecessarily complex or even contradictory results because the content of the list of identified proteins depends heavily on the conditions for triggering the collection of tandem mass spectra. Small changes in the signal intensity of a peptide in different LC-MS experiments can lead to the collection of a tandem mass spectrum in one experiment but not in another. Also, the quality of the tandem mass spectrometry experiments can vary, leading to successful identification in some cases but not in others. Using a novel image analysis approach, it is possible to achieve repeat analysis with a very high reproducibility by matching peptides across different LC-MS experiments using the retention time and parent mass over charge (m/z). It is also easy to confirm the final result visually. This approach has been investigated by using tryptic digests of integral membrane proteins from organelle-enriched fractions from Arabidopsis thaliana and it has been demonstrated that very highly reproducible, consistent, and reliable LC-MS data interpretation can be made.
引用
收藏
页码:1509 / 1514
页数:6
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]   Mass spectrometry-based proteomics [J].
Aebersold, R ;
Mann, M .
NATURE, 2003, 422 (6928) :198-207
[2]   Quantifying reproducibility for differential proteomics: noise analysis for protein liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry of human serum [J].
Anderle, M ;
Roy, S ;
Lin, H ;
Becker, C ;
Joho, K .
BIOINFORMATICS, 2004, 20 (18) :3575-3582
[3]  
BERG M, 2006, IN PRESS RAPID COMMU
[4]   An overview of ensembl [J].
Birney, E ;
Andrews, TD ;
Bevan, P ;
Caccamo, M ;
Chen, Y ;
Clarke, L ;
Coates, G ;
Cuff, J ;
Curwen, V ;
Cutts, T ;
Down, T ;
Eyras, E ;
Fernandez-Suarez, XM ;
Gane, P ;
Gibbins, B ;
Gilbert, J ;
Hammond, M ;
Hotz, HR ;
Iyer, V ;
Jekosch, K ;
Kahari, A ;
Kasprzyk, A ;
Keefe, D ;
Keenan, S ;
Lehvaslaiho, H ;
McVicker, G ;
Melsopp, C ;
Meidl, P ;
Mongin, E ;
Pettett, R ;
Potter, S ;
Proctor, G ;
Rae, M ;
Searle, S ;
Slater, G ;
Smedley, D ;
Smith, J ;
Spooner, W ;
Stabenau, A ;
Stalker, J ;
Storey, R ;
Ureta-Vidal, A ;
Woodwark, KC ;
Cameron, G ;
Durbin, R ;
Cox, A ;
Hubbard, T ;
Clamp, M .
GENOME RESEARCH, 2004, 14 (05) :925-928
[5]   TANDEM: matching proteins with tandem mass spectra [J].
Craig, R ;
Beavis, RC .
BIOINFORMATICS, 2004, 20 (09) :1466-1467
[6]   The use of isotope-coded affinity tags (ICAT) to study organelle proteomes in Arabidopsis thaliana [J].
Dunkley, TPJ ;
Dupree, P ;
Watson, RB ;
Lilley, KS .
BIOCHEMICAL SOCIETY TRANSACTIONS, 2004, 32 :520-523
[7]   A statistical basis for testing the significance of mass spectrometric protein identification results [J].
Eriksson, J ;
Chait, BT ;
Fenyö, D .
ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, 2000, 72 (05) :999-1005
[8]  
Eriksson J, 2002, PROTEOMICS, V2, P262, DOI 10.1002/1615-9861(200203)2:3<262::AID-PROT262>3.0.CO
[9]  
2-W
[10]   Identifying the proteome:: software tools [J].
Fenyö, D .
CURRENT OPINION IN BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2000, 11 (04) :391-395